The following has been added for those who don't want to take the time to watch an 11 minute video, But I highly recommend that you go back and watch it anyway.
LIKABLE LIBERALS...OXYMORON, OR JUST MORONIC?
I visited a liberal blog where the writer was conducting a whine-in about Christians, implying that they engage regularly in torture, ugliness and other non-Christians behavior.She quoted some verses of Scripture to introduce her complaint.
In typical liberal style, she quoted the Scripture completely out of context, implied that the Bible is a politically Socialist "document," and otherwise demonstrated her total ignorance of its purpose, nature and message.
What I found most interesting was her sweet, loving liberal references to people who hold a different viewpoint than hers.
"The Lizard " was her reference to Liz Cheney. "Fugly" was another. Nice and uplifting.
She called Dick Cheney, "Dickless..." and "despicable slimeball." That was a nice touch.
The two of them she referred to as, "hideous family." Tolerant.
She called House Minority Leader John Boehner, "Bonehead," and a "a friggin whiny 3 year old."
There were several other instances of this liberal using names that do not pass the gentile verbiage requirement of this blog, but you get the point.
This blogger perfectly represents the liberals who are always calling conservatives "intolerant name callers."
It is good to see the tolerance, politeness and lack of name calling exuded by liberals, isn't it?
32 comments:
We conservatives have been pointing out the flaws in GW for years. The liberals, with there god like perspective, can't accept the fact that the entire human race doesn't mean squat to nature.
ablur: It is really pathetic to see them in their hubris exalt mankind to a position higher than that which was God given. But that's what happens when they delve into moral relativity.
It's not just lefties who write stuff that's not pleasant. Here's a blogger who has you blogrolled, and this is what he says about lefties:
"Beware you liberal kooks and Obama knob-slobbing trolls, Beware you America apologists Communist finks. Islamic Muslims, and atheist and all other unpatriotic America loathing ass-hats."
And you say this on your own blog:
"WHY I CALL HIM "PRESIDENT BO"
I call him "President" out of respect for the office. I call him "BO" (as in Body Odor) because his agenda stinks."
To be consistent, Joe, you should use "AO," Agenda Odor," since it's his agenda you don't like. But instead you use BO as in "BO=Body Odor+Barack Obama," because, y'know, "those" people smell different from us white folks. I've heard that in my lifetime, and I'm reading that implication here.
Joe wrote on his blog:
"I also refer to him as our 'Acting President.'"
"Acting president?" You must have forgotten that this country had an election in November of 2008, where Mr. Obama won the popular AND the electoral vote. Now if you want to believe that somehow winning an election makes Mr. Obama an "acting president" you go ahead if that makes you feel superior and smug.
The only problem is, Joe, that's a delusional belief.
Mr. Obama legitimately won the Presidency of the United States of America and is our Commander in Chief because more Americans wanted him than wanted John McCain and Sarah Palin.
It's called democracy.
But apparently you don't like our form of government and the way we elect our presidents.
"Beware you liberal kooks and Obama knob-slobbing trolls, Beware you America apologists Communist finks. Islamic Muslims, and atheist and all other unpatriotic America loathing ass-hats."
And you say this on your own blog:
"WHY I CALL HIM "PRESIDENT BO"
I call him "President" out of respect for the office. I call him "BO" (as in Body Odor) because his agenda stinks."
That was great Joe..
And I say..
Amen to that!
Joe said
"I visited a liberal blog where the writer was conducting a whine-in about Christians, implying that they engage regularly in torture, ugliness and other non-Christians behavior.
She quoted some verses of Scripture to introduce her complaint.
In typical liberal style, she quoted the Scripture completely out of context, implied that the Bible is a politically Socialist "document," and otherwise demonstrated her total ignorance of its purpose, nature and message."
----------------------------------
I say, that sounds like something
Shaw Kenawe would have said.
SK: Can you not tell the difference between calling someone a "knob-slobbing troll" and calling them a "f-head?"
Really? You're that dense? I have trouble believing that...you seemed so quasi-intelligent on the surface.
From your own blog there was this phrase: "Liberal-bashing trolls harassed my friend..."
What about the liberal blog in which the following statement was made: "May you rot in Hell Mr. Bush." (That's a copy and paste.)
Is it beyond you to take the "BO" and apply it to the agenda, not the man as I very clearly do?"
Who do you mean by "those people?" Who, in your mind, are "those people," and where did you find a reference to "them" in my blog? Maybe it was not my blog that brought "them" up, but your mind.
What are you saying? Are you referring to a group of people who smell different somehow?
In your mind, which is the more offensive way to refer to a president: "Acting President" or
as one liberal blogger referred to President Bush as a "f...ing s...t-head?" (certain letters left out by me.)
Have I overestimated the inate intelligence of liberals?
SK: BTW: Can you site a place on my blog where I said lefties were the only ones who "write stuff that's not pleasant?"
TTPMO: She might have, but her's is not the blog I read it on.
RiR: Thanks. Unlike SK, I think President BO is a real actor.
Enjoy your hate fest, Joe and the rest.
President Obama is the POTUS and will be for a long time.
SK: Two years, 9 months and 8 Days (give-or-take a couple of days).
Shaw Kenawe said...
Enjoy your hate fest, Joe and the rest.
President Obama is the POTUS and will be for a long time.
Uhhhh. Well maybe..
Joe,
I see you have the Carnival troll who's come to my blog twice to write juvenile comments about Michelle Obama's backside.
Apparently "Carnival" is obsessed with Mr. Obama's physical appearance, which is understandable in someone who's probably, what? 14 years old?
Also Joe, YOU are the one who used the term BO meaning the president stinks. I pointed out that it is the president's AGENDA you believe stinks, so why would you use his initials unless you were trying to use an old slur on African Americans, or are you not aware that people have been using that slur for generations?
And, when someone comes to my blog and does nothing but bash other commenters, they ARE most definitely trolls. That Carnival troll, for example, commented on Mrs. Obama's backside in the section that had nothing to do with her.
Classic troll behavior.
Shaw Kenawe said...
Enjoy your hate fest, Joe and the rest.
President Obama is the POTUS and will be for a long time.
But like Joe so correctly said, "HE WILL BE A ONE TERM PRESIDENT!"
BRAVO! Excellent point Joe! And then we'll be rid of this Liberal/Progressive/Marxist and his GANG who are destroying this country.
People like Shaw Kenawe and her 2 or 3 cronies who pollute the Blogisphere with their liberal slander are not only morally harmful. But they corrupt the minds of others by their idiotic blogs and their propergander.
And by the way Shaw, I have read things that you have said about Joe on other blogs that are disgusting. Why the sudden kinship!
Another VICIOUS LIE by the Queen of LIES! Ms. Shaw Kenawe .
YOU know damn well that you deleted my original post and you wrote your own version of it using MY name. I never wrote what you claim I wrote, you changed it to make me look like a BAD Republican!! A trick that is very easy for the author of a blog to do. And you Shaw are the master of tricking people. Or at least you think that you are.
We Americans are sick and tire of your lies Shaw. We have rallied to fight fascism, communism, socialism and Islamofascism. Now it’s time to rally them against ''progressiveism.'' It's an ism which for most Americans is not defined or is ill defined. If you just show people that it's a code word for ''socialism'' and that the ideas are the same you'll be better off. A “ism” that Ms. Shaw Kenawe has been promoting since day one of her socialist blog.
Us real Americans are sick of liberals like you, we actually care about our country.
Whether it comes to taxes, global warming, Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, amnesty, Healthcare, or the debt, anyone found deigning to question the liberal Democrat party running up massive debts, refusing to making national security decisions, ridiculing Americans for having the gall to ask questions regarding any of the above is automatically dismissed because Democrats think they know better than the American People. You betcha' Americans are sick of this current bunch of smug, arrogant elitists running the show, ridiculing and dismissing the American People who want no part of what they are offering. Elitism and the Left go hand in hand... there is actually a concept the Marxists/ Leninists called "The PROGRESSIVE’S" for their ideal communist state... idea was that the common folk are just too stupid to run their own lives, so an elite chosen by the party would run their lives for them. You and your cronies over at your smelly blog ridicule any, and everyone that has a”R” after their name.
This same concept is seen in the differences between Dems and Repubs... Dems tend to shove regulations and taxes down our throat that we don't want because they say they know what's good for us... while Repubs tend to be more like real American ! And YES, I believe Rush, and Glenn before any socialist Marxist liberal lair who supports the obama administration. I think America is sick and tired of the smug, arrogant, elitism of academic conservatives who ignore, dismiss, and ridicule the American People because they think they know what's best for Americans. And I believe as Joe does, that after 2012, Obama will be out in the street, organizing his community again. And I’m sick and tired of people like you treating Republican politicians as if they were slave masters by labeling us republicans as racists!
Figure it out. We have never been in such a mess as we are now and if you think the American people will stand for it you are sadly mistaken Our freedom is at stake and we wont give that up very easily. Why do you think Obama wants to disarm our men when they return from Iraq? Because they may not agree with Obama on his agenda. you haven’t seen certain groups come out of the wood work but they will and who knows what will happen to Mr Obama I welcome it all I got to say I welcome it. You’ll learn that even you are going to be a slave to this ass hole once his Marxist agenda is in place.
Joe, you are dead on - the Far Left are sickening.
Isn’t it amazing how arrogance and incompetence people like Ms. Kenawe are. She acts as if she rules the blogsphere when she is on her own Blog. But she acts like a crying whining baby here when she re-did my comment and complains that I acted like a dumb Republican nut job. Well Americans are sick and tired of people like her and especially with Obama. We are tired of his socialist policies period! I'm more than sick of it and people have GOT TO WAKE UP and become advocates of what our country was founded on. These far left elitists are KILLING our country and the values we were founded on. Too many hard working Americans have become complacent and think this "change" in our country won't effect them...when it's actually going to DIRECTLY affect them and their every day life. I think it's time to ignore all of these loons, they are the distraction. If it weren’t for the fact that they are doing so much damage to our country, I would advocate ignoring them... but we can’t. We must stop their tearing down America,
Have a great day Joe.
Shaw, I couldn't agree more. I'm tired and I'm tired of all the attacks. Don't progressives get enough from right-wing nuts?
The disdain and despair I'm seeing here is because people are so ingrained with the idea that things are Either/Or - Either Liberal or Conservative - that when BOTH political philosophies are consumed by partisan b-llsh-t they don't know where to turn.
I don't agree with everything Obama has done and I have been disappointed with some of his decisions ( civil liberties record being among them), but much of the liberal blogosphere lost me when the criticism transitioned to the sort of polarized hatred that makes intellectually honest discourse and analysis impossible. For every cogent criticism I come across, I read at least a dozen other hyperbolic rants that are based on little more than fear-mongering and reflexive nit-picking. We're now at the part where "liberals" are bashing Howard Dean's proposed Medicare expansion because it doesn't fit the narrowly defined litmus test of what must be done according to the left-wing commandeered. Too many egos, too little thought.
It seems a bit pathetic to run away from the Liberal label just because of the obnoxiousness of some of its other adherents. One's liberalism seems to me to be determined by one's values and beliefs, not by one's style. If you feel that you have parted ways with the liberal movement on substance, then that is one thing.
But to say that I are no longer a liberal because some other liberals say offensive things, or say reasonable things in offensive ways - well, that cutting and running.
But that doesn't mean that I am abandoning my long-held views on the appropriateness of government power, of the necessity of government regulation in the marketplace, and of the need for government to work for social justice--views that describe me, basically, as a liberal. Yes, a log of the people on the left are acting like complete jackasses. Yes, those people on the left have zero knowledge of how to work within the political system to gain their desired ends. And, no, those two facts do not change my philosophies that inform my views on particular policy issues.
The fight between "left" and "right" over Obama is awe-inspiring in its ability to distract well-meaning people from *real* events, real actions, real discussion. It's a fight that contains no factual information whatsoever and can never be won or lost except in the minds of the most distraught. When you fight about whether or not Obama is a wimp, whether he likes the war or not, that he had no choice, he had to send troops, you're falling into the trap laid by the establishment in order to protect and justify itself. The system is invalid, it fails to represent the majority, it breeds inequality and suffering, yet nobody is talking about replacing the system, as you're all too caught up in the fallacy of the relevance of the presidency. What's stopping Obama from stopping the war - all wars, in fact? It's not politics. It's not congress, it's not the media or the "left" or "right." What could possibly be preventing the most powerful man in the world from making the most morally honest decision in the world and simply ending the war? (Hint: he doesn't want it to end.) And why isn't that the discussion? Are we so far gone that we can't even recognize the simple moral truisms that murder, theft and rape are abhorrent and that in every facet of our lives we should struggle to abolish all forms of injustice, including the ultimate injustice, war itself?
Make it a real discussion. Talk to people about things that actually matter, like what kind of world we want to live in, regardless of its current manifestation. It's difficult to break free, to work and think outside the establishment dogma, but it's completely necessary. Progress is impossible without a realization and acceptance of the real conditions of today and the possible world of tomorrow. Forget about Obama, there's more worth fighting about, and he'll never fight for it for you.
But I'm still a liberal.
Carnival troll,
You came to my blog and dropped in a comment that had NOTHING to do with my posted subject. All you did was insult the First Lady and then hid behind a non-linkable name; and when I chose to counter your insult as I saw fit to on my own blog, you present yourself here as INJURED?
You give narcissism a really bad name. LOL! A troll has no claim to being treated like a civilized commenter.
BTW, CARNIVAL troll, you certainly get yourself in a raging tizzy over what I do on my own blog, what I say to other bloggers, and what my political philosophy is. Wow! I had no idea you cared that much.
Really, darlin', you need to get yourself a life. It's a beautiful world out there. Why don't you try living in it instead of following me around the internet and throwing temper tantrums?
Shaw Kenawe said...
Carnival troll,
You came to my blog and dropped in a comment that had NOTHING to do with my posted subject. All you did was insult the First Lady and then hid behind a non-linkable name; and when I chose to counter your insult as I saw fit to on my own blog, you present yourself here as INJURED?
DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT, CHANGE MY COMMENT?
A SIMPLE YES OR NO WILL A SIMPLE YES OR NO WILL SUFFICE!
YOU MY CHANGED THE POST TO YOUR SATISFACTION, YOU KNOW DAMN WELL THAT YOU DID.
AND NOW YOU COME HERE AND LIE LIKE A RUG.
And you call ME a TROLL?
Well I'm calling YOU a DAMN LIAR! Just as you usually are.
You Changed the wording in MY Post, to satisfy yourself and then you came here and played the victim, telling Joe that I wrote something else. And calling ME a Troll. Well I'm calling YOU a DAMN LIAR!
Shaw Kenawe said...
BTW, CARNIVAL troll, you certainly get yourself in a raging tizzy over what I do on my own blog, what I say to other bloggers, and what my political philosophy is. Wow! I had no idea you cared that much.
Really, darlin', you need to get yourself a life. It's a beautiful world out there. Why don't you try living in it instead of following me around the internet and throwing temper tantrums?
Changing the subject and shifting the blame to me is just another one of your LOUSY LIBERAL tricks, but it's not going to work here!
You are still a LOUSY DAMN LAIR! Who re-wrote MY comments to make me look bad! So don't YOU tell me about throwing temper tantrums, and changing the subject
Carnival troll wrote this in my blog comments on Ken Blackwell:
CARNIVAL WEIGHT GUESSER: has left a new comment on your post "KEN BLACKWELL SPREADS INCENDIARY LIES AND HATRED A...":
Oh please, Michelle’s fat back side is just the result of genetics. If men and women find it attractive, terrific. She just seems an odd choice to be preaching to everyone about eating habits
Here’s the skinny on my take on Michelle being put in charge.
It just might have been a bad mistake to put Michelle in charge of the child obesity program.
As a professional weight guesser, there’s no doubt in my mind that Michelle’s either at the top end
of her weight class or would be categorized overweight. I put her at 185 pounds striped.. .
I think the best thing the press can do is ask her how much she weighs because if she’s as heavy at I
think, she’s no one to be a spokesman for this program.
Just my opinion.
CARNIVAL troll: I have no obligation to treat you like a civilized commenter when you use MY BLOG to spew your hatred of Mrs. Obama.
I have an idea--go start your own blog and demonize the First Lady on it--you'll feel proud of your little self and get a bunch of adolescents to come and read it and tell you how brilliant your insults are.
BTW: You're comments here in ALL CAPS show us all that you are in a rage over something you brought on yourself by your trollish behavior.
YOU LIE again.
And You Never Answered My Question!
DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT, CHANGE MY COMMENT?
A SIMPLE YES OR NO WILL A SIMPLE YES OR NO WILL SUFFICE!
Either Answer or I'm done here!
WELL, DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT, CHANGE HIS OR HER COMMENT?
A SIMPLE YES OR NO WILL SUFFICE!
WHY ARE YOUR NOT ANSWERING?
IF YOU DON'T ANSWER THEN WE ALL KNOW THAT YOU ARE GUILT OF DOING IT.
I guess that you are anyway
Anonymous said...
WHY ARE YOUR NOT ANSWERING?
IF YOU DON'T ANSWER THEN WE ALL KNOW THAT YOU ARE GUILT OF DOING IT.
I guess that you are guilty of LYING anyway
------------------------------------
You'll get no argument from me about that!!!!!
To the Carnival troll, Anonymous, and armywife84:
When a troll like Carnival troll comes to my blog and hijacks a comment thread by insulting Michelle Obama, that troll deserves whatever happens to it.
That Carnival troll gets itself all in a tizzy over what happened to its comment is too idiotic to address.
Carnival troll acted like a jerk on my blog. Period.
I. Owe. The. Troll. No. Explanation.
Period.
CFT: Look, I understand your angst, and if SK changed one of your comments, shame on her. She should have just deleted it.
This is my blog. It is governed by my rules and no others. I am the sole arbiter of what does and does not get published here.
When someone violates my rules, he/she gets deleted, no matter what side of the policical fence they're on, or even if they straddle it.
I want to make clear that I do not allow personal attacks against other commenters, including SK, with whom I disagree 98.0564301% of the time.
If you will, please stick to presenting factual information and opinnion on a given topic and try to avoid attacking others personally.
Thanks.
SK: You are no angel, inspite of what you might or might not think.
References to others as trolls in a general sense is perfectly OK, but making the charge of "troll" as a personal attack is NOT OK.
TO BOTH OF YOU: If you two want to eat each other alive, I don't care. But do it on your own blogs.
I don't want to dis-invite either of you here and am perfectly happy to engage in dialog with either of you.
But please, call each other wrong if your want to, giving your evidence as much as you wish, but don't call each other names.
I can handle that task all by my little old self...if you don't mind (actually, even if you do.)
Example: "Liberals are trolls" is OK. "You are a troll" is NOT OK, OK?
MY OPINION: SK should answer the question, but not here. On her own blog or on CFT's blog (if he had one). Certainly nobody is required to answer anybody else on MY blog.
This is not court, and, trust me, you don't want me for a judge.
In the future, castigate me if you must (you'd be wrong to do so, of course), dialog with me if you wish, but please bre'er fox...don't throw me in that briar patch.
Wait...that's another story.
Pardon me Joe for getting so carried away. You are 100 percent correct.
But to make my case, this is where it all happened in the 1st place, here is where she (Shaw K ) called me that Troll name.. I do no have a blog but if I did I would devote the entire blog calling her out. As someone needs to do.
You are right even if I were a troll, she should have just deleted my post if she didn't like it,
Isn't that the most cowardly and stupid thing you ever heard?
Not change the whole wordage and sign my name to it.
That my friend is the work of a liberal coward.
And she Shaw L fits that term perfectly. Liberal cowards are just partisan hacks, as her blog is.
Look at her home page cover, look at the things she says there and what she pictures.
The most cowardly thing is someone who takes you to a the pissing contest and posts rude and nasty things there and then blocks you out by changing your posts or delete it. Here site is full of such cowards. They attack you with mindless hate speech, then block you and run hide before you can respond..The jerkoids spew their hate and lies on the internet because they can hide behind a wall of anonymity.
KdB: Sorry to delete you, but I must stand by my rules evenhandedly. You may not come on this blog and use vulgarities.
Joe, you can believe her if you wish to.. But I DID NOT post what she posted here.
She changed my post entirely to make me look foolish.
This will be my last statement on this matter.
SK is a liar and af you want to buy into her lies, well too bad for all of us.
Bye bye
I have tried a few times to venture into a few of these sites including Shaws, but quite frankly, it is like talking to my two year old. Neither one understands logic.
Therefore, I tend to stay on the conservative sites, and only stray over when I am insanely bored. I do however, enjoy engaging in some of these conversations with the libs I work with, as it is priceless to see their faces when they cannot respond to logical arguments. They generally get frustrated and make some comment about the mess Bush left us in, or some other BS like that.
CFT: I am not doubting your assertions, I just don't want to deal with other's conflicts here.
WMUR: It can be both frustrating and fun to visit liberal blogs, as they absolutely refuse to think in straight line logic or to stick to the subject.
I try to approach visits to liberals' blogs as little more than weird humor.
Post a Comment