Thursday, July 24, 2014

How Proud We Can All Be

Pro-Russian rebels, probably directly responsible for the shooting down of Malaysian Airlines flight 17, murdering 298 people, have now driven United Nations investigators out of the region shooting at them as they left. Translation: The United Nations is powerless to do anything significant, even such an important task as to investigate the taking down of a civilian airliner.

But have no fear! President BO (the amateur president) is here! Remember, there were Americans in that plane. They might not have been as important as the ambassadors in Benghazi, but they were Americans. So this involves us, the U.S. Therefore, PBO (tap)’s firm response has been issued. He bravely said:

“…as I’ve said throughout this crisis…to President Putin as well as publically (what the heck does that mean: publically?), my preference continues to be finding a diplomatic resolution within Ukraine. (What? A diplomatic solution to the shooting down of a civilian airliner? Hasn’t the deed already been done? What solution? He’s going to bring the dead bodies back to life? Because that’s the only thing that could be considered a solution.) I believe that can still happen. That is my preference today and will continue to be my preference.

“…if Russia continues to violate Ukraine’s sovereignty, and to back these separatists, and these separatists become more and more dangerous (What? More dangerous than shoot down a civilian airliner?) and now are risks, not simply to the people inside of Ukraine, but the broader international community (Is not the shooting down of a civilian airliner ALREADY beyond the “risk”?) then Russia will only further isolate itself from the international community (something that I’m sure makes them tremble in their boots) and the costs for Russia’s behavior will only continue to increase.” (Ooh! I’ll bet that put fear in Putin’s gizzard!)

This pathetic excuse for a man, this cowardly, lily-livered, yellow-bellied, sap sucking amateur Spokesperson in Chief for America will take the same stand in this situation that he took in Libya, in Egypt and in other Islamic nations. Red lines and all, we know how that turned out.

So now he takes a kneel before President Putin, now considered the most powerful man on earth. That will turn Putin into a bowl of Jell-O, right?

Wake up Americans! Wake up to PBO (tap)’s ineffectiveness on the world stage! Wake up to the man who wants to “fundamentally change” America by bringing her down! Wake up to this namby-pamby pot of international Pablum. Get this guy and those of his ilk out of D.C.!

We want to keep America!

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

"So What's Next?" Is the Question the World Is Asking

RUSSIAN President Vladimir Putin
has been named the most powerful
person in the world by Forbes, toppling
US President Barack Obama
It seems that I have been right concerning Obama's amateurism. Around the world, people are asking (particularly our allies) "Who is this guy and what on earth is he up to?"

We have this from  The National Post:
The world’s governments no longer worry as much as they once did about what Washington wants, partly because Washington doesn't know what it wants. U.S. policy has become erratic and half-hearted, subject to arbitrary change without notice.
Barack Obama, who apparently distrusts American power, personifies this approach. He moves capriciously from subject to subject. One week he’s furious about Syria and announces that Bashar al-Assad has to go. When Assad doesn't go, Obama loses interest. He seems always to be making a fresh start. When he’s not doing that, he’s “pivoting,” shifting his interest from one continent to another. He seems detached much of the time, then committed, then detached again.
On Libya, for instance, Obama opposed taking part in the UN strike to oust Muammar Gaddafi. Then suddenly he decided to join the French and other participants. The American bombs he sent became the key to destroying Gaddafi and his reign, but Obama claimed America had played only a peripheral role.
An Obama adviser famously described Libya as a new model for American intervention, “leading from behind.” Whatever it was, the allies didn't follow through and Libya was left in chaos. Terrorists gratefully inherited a huge cache of weapons.
On Iran, the United States has taken several large steps backward. When Israel publicly considered bombing Iranian nuclear sites, the Americans discouraged the Israelis and adopted Iran’s bomb as their own problem. Soon they announced, portentously, that all “options are on the table,” including not just sanctions but also force.
The idea of an attack was soon abandoned, however, and last autumn a new approach was taken: negotiation. The United States led the UN Security Council and Germany in the effort to persuade Iran to give up its dreams of a nuclear bomb in return for the lifting of economic sanctions.
In November, the Washington Post echoed the government with a triumphant headline: “Iran, world powers reach historic nuclear deal.” But in fact they had merely made a deal to hold some meetings about making a deal that might be historic.
After half a year of talking, Iran’s view can now be summarized: No, we are not building a nuclear bomb and No, you can’t come and inspect us.

Then there is this from The Daily Mail:
That the Parliament of our closest ally, Great Britain, rejected an air campaign first gave Mr Obama an additional reason for inactivity. The flailing seemed to end when Russian President Vladimir Putin opened the door to a negotiated deal with Syria. But it was not the end; it was the beginning.
For as the administration rushed to that door, all over the world those who depended on America when in harrowing circumstances were asking themselves: How reliable is America now? How strong now?
Also asking was Mr Putin. He noted the contrast between Mr Obama’s bold talk and timid response. As the former head of a friendly government said in a small meeting I attended not long ago: ‘Putin is cautious. He will probe. If he encounters resistance, he will pull back.’
The US failure to follow through in Syria gave the Russian president confidence that he could move with impunity.
SOON he was picking a fight with Ukraine. Like the scene in The Godfather – when, at his child’s baptism, Michael Corleone renounces the devil as the camera cuts back and forth to his men eliminating rival gangsters – Putin, before global television cameras, watched the opening ceremonies of the Sochi Olympics as Russian troops began movements preparatory to seizing Crimea.
This week, in the skies over Ukraine, we saw the consequences of the recklessness that the Russian godfather’s probing has unleashed.
Putin was not the only one to detect opportunity in American indecision. China stepped up its probes in the East and South China Seas. In the Middle East, with the US military presence drawn down nearly to zero in Iraq and soon Afghanistan, an army of ruthless fanatics gestating unnoticed in Syria’s east saw the chance to break out of national boundaries and within a few weeks occupied much of western and central Iraq.
Why has so much of the global order come apart so fast?
For the same reason that, as a friend reports, on the streets of San Salvador those who will smuggle your child to the Rio Grande have been securing an unprecedented volume of sign-ups. When asked about the chances of the child staying in America once the border is crossed, they tell parents: ‘It has never been easier.’
Now the word on weakness is everywhere, even the poorest barrios of Central America.
The Scary Part is that Americans, especially liberals, support President BO (the amateur president)'s

The context for the change in America’s international role was provided by a Pew Research Center poll in December. It determined that more than half of Americans now think the United States should mind its own business and let other countries “get along the best they can on their own” — the highest number since Pew began raising that issue 40 years ago. Robert Kagan, the author of The World America Made, believes Americans feel an uneasy desire to shed the burdens that their country assumed from 1941 to the end of the Cold War. Many Americans imagine they would be happier in a “normal” kind of America, a nation more attuned to its own needs, less to those of the wider world.

Obama’s policies may have evolved in response to this public view, or perhaps his ideas influenced the public. The uncomfortable truth, however, is that the United States is the only great power in this generation. And power always brings responsibilities.

In spite of the liberal left's insistence that PBO (tap) is a good president, he is not so regarded by the rest of the world. That he was elected twice is a testament to the gullibility of the left.

Monday, July 21, 2014

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Friday, July 18, 2014

A Real President

A CIVILIAN aircraft was shot down. We are not sure exactly who did it, but it is nevertheless down.

It might have been the Russians. It might have been Russian separatists. It might have been the Ukrainian government. Whoever it was, this is an international incident of monumental proportions.

The U.S. State Department, at their first press briefing, pretended nothing had happened and chose to speak about routine matters.

President BO (the amateur president) chose not to spend time on the event at the fundraising speech he was giving. Later he reacted with "sadness" at the event, but no more.

This is the least "presidential" president in the history of the nation. He came into the job unprepared and has learned absolutely nothing while in office (power). He refuses to deal appropriately with international matters. He is a weak kneed, lily-livered, yellow-bellied sap sucker. To any civilized American, he is pathetic.

In 1983 a Korean passenger jet liner was shot down by the then Soviets. Whereas President BO (the amateur president) would have gone fund raising, a real president would have effectively addressed the nation like this:

BTW: Ronald Reagan CANCELLED the remainder of his vacation to make this speech. Can you even imagine "President" Obama cancelling anything for something of this magnitude?  Well he didn't.

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Talk about Income Disparity

Salary of retired US presidents: $450,000 per year for life.

Salary of House/Senate members: $174000 per year for life

Salary of the Speaker of the House: $223,500 per year for life

Salary of Majority/Minority Leaders: $194,400 per year for life.

Average salary of a soldier DEPLOYED in Afghanistan: $38,000 per year

Average income for seniors on Social Security: $12,000 per year

If you want to deal with income disparity, I know a good place to start.

ADDENDUM: I guess I give too many liberals too much credit for figuring out what a particular post is about. They seem unable to connect current events to a particular post unless led by the hand one idea at a time. I'm sorry for them, but I want to help. Therefore, let me connect the principles of this post to a current claim by a possible presidential candidate. Hillary Clinton claimed to have been dead broke when she and Bill left the WH. Let's give them that (even though it is unimaginable). Since then they both have demanded over $100,000 per speech. If they have each spoken 10 times since then, their debts were paid off and they are now rolling in dough. 

Come on, liberals. Even YOU can get this.