PCC and Others: This post is proof positive that liberals do not care what the truth is. If they say something did not happen, it did not happen, even if there is proof that it DID.
And, if they say something happened, it happened, even if there is proof that it did NOT.
To a liberal, truth is whatever they say it is at the time they say it, irrespective of whether or not it is actually true.
It is extremely difficult to refute this kind of "truth," because proof means nothing to a liberal.
That's why liberal judges, liberal politicians and liberal bloggers are so dangerous to America.
Hearing the words and how he parsed them does offer him some wiggle room.
By choosing the words intensely he has tried to quantify the group and divide it up. They can now pick and choose what there definition of this is and thereby clear the way for their poor choice in words.
Words based on personal opinion and vague interpretation are the marquee of the liberal politician. This is how they save there butts on a daily basis.
Carter is now the second worst president of America and to be challenged like that while he is still alive is more ten he can handle.
Someone needs to coin a word: maybe democratist. That is someone who holds the view that, although all politicians-and people in general for that matter,can play fast and loose with the truth, Democrats actively support and encourage it in the interest of political gain. That would qualify me as a color blind democratist.
I was born in Miami, Florida, the son of an Air Force officer, traveled the world, was saved at age 17, and have served the Lord since. That's me on the left and my lovely wife, Bonnie...the pretty one...on the right.
1. Absolutely no foul language (including the use of asterisks). If you are not man or woman enough to control your language, you are not welcome here...go somewhere else.
2. I am not looking for strings of commenters arguing with each other, so confine your comments to the topic at hand and address your comments to me, unless you can be exceptionally gracious and polite.
3. Since this is my blog, I am the sole arbiter of what can be placed on this blog. My decisions are final and without recourse. All anonymous comments, unsigned, will be deleted, as will ad hominem attacks against me or others.
4. Within the scope of those rules, you may feel free to have fun here (I sure will). Sarcasm, wit, half-wit, nit-wit, parody, satire, puns (especially puns), etc. are encouraged.
FOUR PRINCIPLES THAT DEFINE TRUE CONSERVATISM:
1. Respect for The Constitution
2. Respect for Life
3. The Smallest Possible Government
4. Individual Responsibility
This blog is about my philosophy of government, which is a very conservative philosophy.
You are not required to agree with me (although you would be better off if you did).
I am biased toward conservatism, and make no apologies for that.
Freedom means not being controlled by the government, that being the very reason we declared our independence from Great Britain.
Government's job is not to provide things for people, but to provide the opportunity for people to persue the things they want via the vehicles of freedom and responsibility.
FAIR USE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
5 comments:
Yep, he can deny the truth of his remarks all he wants, but the video record is undeniable.
I wonder what Mrs. Carter was thinking as she sat beside him while he dug himself deeper and deeper.
Not even Skin So Soft can save him this time.
PCC and Others: This post is proof positive that liberals do not care what the truth is. If they say something did not happen, it did not happen, even if there is proof that it DID.
And, if they say something happened, it happened, even if there is proof that it did NOT.
To a liberal, truth is whatever they say it is at the time they say it, irrespective of whether or not it is actually true.
It is extremely difficult to refute this kind of "truth," because proof means nothing to a liberal.
That's why liberal judges, liberal politicians and liberal bloggers are so dangerous to America.
Hearing the words and how he parsed them does offer him some wiggle room.
By choosing the words intensely he has tried to quantify the group and divide it up. They can now pick and choose what there definition of this is and thereby clear the way for their poor choice in words.
Words based on personal opinion and vague interpretation are the marquee of the liberal politician. This is how they save there butts on a daily basis.
Carter is now the second worst president of America and to be challenged like that while he is still alive is more ten he can handle.
Y'know I've said it before, it's time to pick Jimmys nursing home!
Someone needs to coin a word: maybe democratist. That is someone who holds the view that, although all politicians-and people in general for that matter,can play fast and loose with the truth, Democrats actively support and encourage it in the interest of political gain. That would qualify me as a color blind democratist.
Post a Comment