Wednesday, October 15, 2008


When I was a little boy (a long, long time ago), my mother used to tell me that certain other little boys (and/or girls) were not the kind I wanted to play with. She said they would bring me down to their level.

My mother was a smart woman.

She realized that associations lead to alliances and that alliances lead to complicity.

A few years ago a gang shot and killed a local, well liked highschool band leader.

The whole gang was found guilty, even the guy who was only driving the car in which the others rode to the band leader's house.

He was seen as complicit in the crime.

If you aid and abet a gun crime resulting in a death, you are guilty, even if you are not the one who pulls the trigger.

So what if you teach for, encourage and give lots of money to ACORN?

Have you formed an alliance with them?

I say, "Yes."

Any clear thinking person would understand that.

Associations may or may not indicate complicity.

Allianced do.

BO has denied ANY involvement with ACORN (which group he proudly bragged on earlier in the campaign), which denial has been shown to be untrue.

Whatever they have done that is illegal, immoral, untoward, or scandalous, he is guilty of as well, not by association, but by alliance.

In my opinion, BO, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and not a few others belong behind bars for what they have done to our country.

Woe unto us if BO is elected president...which is a real possibility if we don't get with it.


Anonymous said...

This whole ACORN thing is kind of nutty. Good analogy - I agree.

Pasadena Closet Conservative said...

We can win this election if we stay strong and fight for our lives on election day.

Mark said...

Yes, and accomplice AFTER the fact is sti;l a crime, too.