Monday, October 22, 2012

WHY BY TOPIC 01

TERROR

If you are a liberal, are you smart enough to know the difference between statements people make that are of a general nature and those that are of a specific nature?

So, when President BO (the child president) said he said the attacks on Benghazi were acts of terror on the very first day, was he telling the truth, or had he been speaking about terrorism in general?

And if he thought they were acts of terror on the very first day, why did he then spend the next 14 days talking about them being protests against a stupid video? And why did he allow his staff and representatives to say the very same thing, without one more reference to them being acts of terror?

If he was “investigating” and did not know, why did he offer any explanation al all until the “investigation” was over?

How come the smartest man to occupy the White House didn’t recognize what these attacks were when a stupid little conservative like me knew immediately that they were planned acts of terror?

BANKRUPTCY

Why would President BO (the child president) state that candidate Romney “…wanted to take them (auto manufacturers and others) into bankruptcy without providing them any way to stay open,” when bankruptcy is designed to allow a business to stay open while reorganizing to become profitable?

Why is PBO (tcp) still insisting that the bailouts were the proper way to deal with the auto, banking and other industries, and that almost all of the bailout money has been “paid back” when nothing could be further from the truth?

How well is the government subsidized Chevy Volt doing? Have they had to lay off any workers lately? Just a few, or many?

What about the so-called “green” companies Obama pressed to support? How many of them are still in business? Might allowing them to go through the proper bankruptcy procedures saved them?

OIL AND GAS ON FEDERAL LANDS

What could be the motive for President BO (the child president) claiming that oil and gas production on federal lands is up when in fact oil and gas production on federal lands is down? Doe the fact that he closed off a great deal of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska to more development not count or something?

Why does he try to take credit for more production on private land but opposes more production of oil and gas in this country whenever possible?

Does it make sense to reduce off shore drilling in U.S. waters while sending taxpayer dollars to Brazil for their off shore drilling?

INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW.

7 comments:

Radical Redneck said...

The Benghazi fiasco is just part and parcel of the last 4 years of Obama's disastrous, failed policies.
For four years, Obama, and his administration along with the news media have been covering up for him and his dishonest acts. Especially when it come to his defending Islamist terrorism as if this last attack had nothing at all to do with terrorism, or any connection to Al qaeda. When in this case as in every other case, these attacks were perpetrated by Muslims hell bent on killing Americans an on world domination.
The manner in which Obama handled the Benghazi attack and the way that he acted in response to it is nothing less than scandalous; and showed that he has a complete LACK of leadership and that Barack Obama has failed test, period.
The big lie in this case, and there is NO getting away from it, is that piss-poor excuse internet about a video clip, promoting a movie that may not even exist. And even Candy Crowley can’t help his get out of that one. Even with Hillary Clintoon’s loyalty.
And let’s not let U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice’s controversial comments on Libya days and days after the attack where she blamed the film as well go unanswered either, she should have been TOLD to step down a long time ago. . . Obama and America’s favorite Smirking Chimp Joe Biden have been lying through their teeth for the path 2 months and must be held accountable.

Ducky's here said...

... bankruptcy is designed to allow a business to stay open while reorganizing to become profitable?

---------
Some forms but others are designed to dissolve the company and distribute the remaining assets.

Wrong on this one Joe.

Ducky's here said...

Does it make sense to reduce off shore drilling in U.S. waters while sending taxpayer dollars to Brazil for their off shore drilling?

---------
I'm afraid that's wrong, Joe and you really need to stop listening to that court jest, Glenn beck.
There was a loan guaranteed by the Export/Import bank which resulted in a Brazilian drilling contract that generated a few hundred jobs in Houston.
Why do you hate the American worker?

Inquiring mids want to know?
I doubt it.

Ducky's here said...

So, when President BO (the child president) said he said the attacks on Benghazi were acts of terror on the very first day, was he telling the truth, or had he been speaking about terrorism in general?

------
I can't deal with this level of hair splitting. I have a good bottle of stout waiting in the fridge.

Maybe Brother XO or Brother Craig can answer and still control his blood pressure.

Joe said...

Ducky: "Some forms..."

Exactly.

That's what I said.

"I can't deal with this level of hair splitting."

Yeah...you're a leftist. Leftists can't understand differences that they don't like.

Ducky's here said...

Why would President BO (the child president) state that candidate Romney “…wanted to take them (auto manufacturers and others) into bankruptcy without providing them any way to stay open,” when bankruptcy is designed to allow a business to stay open while reorganizing to become profitable?

----
You said no such thing.

Joe said...

Ducky: Romney wanted the auto companies to go through chapter 11 bankruptcies, which would restructure them to be fiscally viable. That, therefore, is what I referred to.

After Obama wasted taxpayer money to give to the Unions, they still went through chapter 11.

Chapter 7 bankruptcies (total liquidation) is what the Obama-backed solar companies like Solyndra went through, which once again cost the taxpayers money.

That is what Obama (and and your liberal/leftist friends) are accusing Romney of wanting.