SUNDAY RESPITE- Through It All & Didn't My Lord Deliver Daniel-Kaoma

The Delicate Balance

“It’s a very delicate balancing act, because while we tried to make sure they were protected from the cars and the other things that were going on, we also gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well. And we work very hard to keep that balance and to put ourselves in the best position to deescalate, and that’s what you saw,” said Mayor Rawlings-Blake.

She's going to protect them from the cars and other things? What does that even mean?

Oh, wait, "...we also gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well."???

So if you do something I don't like, I should have "space" to go out and destroy other peoples' property? 

So that you don't cry, "Out of context!" here she is:




What is this "delicate balance" she's talking about. There should be a balance between free speech and destruction?

Once again we see the logic of the Democrat/liberal mind set at work.

That statement is beyond outrageous.

A Clear Statement about Racism

So, America. When will you ever learn?  Whether you are a part of the Black community, Caucasian, Asian or whatever, you need to learn this lesson if the USA is going to overcome the racial divide.

Does Josh Earnest really think we're too stupid to understand what he tried to do with this question?

Is there any better example of evasiveness, misdirection, and just plain failing to respond to the question asked? Josh Earnest just answered a question that was not asked, but failed to address the question that WAS asked. And he did it with an expression on his face that any mother would recognize..."Mom, I just told you a lie."

Liberals, are you too dim to recognize Earnest's dishonest answers. He pulls this stuff in every press conference. Can't you see it? Really?

Why Did They Come?

According to some estimates we have about 20,000,000 people in our country illegally. That includes children. Think about what that means!

What that means is that there are up to 20,000,000 people who entered the USA without filling out the paperwork that other immigrants have to fill out. That's unfair to those who fill out the paperwork. If it is OK for that 20,000,000 to come, why isn't it OK for Europeans, Middle Easterners, Africans, Asian or Australians to come as well?

Why did 20,000,000 come to the USA? Is it because their countries are poor and regressive? Is it because their countries are political hot spots? Is it because they lack the guts to fight for freedom and economic advancement in their own country?

20,000,000 people could surely have a strong influence in the way their countries are run, even if you spread 20,000,000 among all of Central America, South America and Mexico. Why don't they work. fight and die for their countries like we did for ours? 

My sense is that they find it much easier and more convenient to just "sneak" across the southern border of the USA and receive the benefits provided by the other 300,000,000 Americans who were already here. 

It is true that some of them are willing to work hard for their families. But they could work hard in their own countries. If there are no jobs back there, why don't they work for economic freedom in their own countries? Why do they continue to allow their countries to adopt economic policies that do lend themselves to economic growth, freedom and the ability to make a profit in a business?

If they come here because education opportunities are here, why don't they fight for education opportunities in their own countries? We did it here. Are they somehow inferior as human beings to us?

I suppose the real question is not "Why did they come?" but, "Why do we let them come?" Are we so bent on being enablers that we refuse to do anything about our immigration problem? Could it be that the issue is about political power, as the Party that gives them their benefits is certain they will get their votes, thus staying in power?

You betcha!

SUNDAY RESPITE-In the Presence of Jehovah-Brooklyn Tabernacle Choir

When is Enough Enough?

According to the New York Times, while she was Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton gave the Russians special consideration in at least one uranium deal in exchange for enormous amounts of cash.

"After their purchase of a major Canadian mining company with world-wide holdings and dealings, the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton."

It turns out that Hillary Clinton’s uranium scandal is much bigger than Whitewater or Hillary’s emailgate or any of her other crimes and unethical behaviors. It is, in fact, so egregious that, if proven in a court of law, would be worthy of extended jail time, that is: her dealings were 100% illegal. 


They also have dealt a stunning blow to national security. Major donors to the Clintons sold half of America’s uranium to Russia. Uranium used for nuclear weapons.

And liberals want her to be the next president.

That figures.