After reading these comments I have to wonder, Why is the left so angry....? I thought they were all tree huggers for peace, love and equality even for all the illegal aliens, and the poor people who can't find their behinds with both hands. that Oblaaama is trying to change the laws to vote for him , mabe he thinks hes a king or a dictator....hummmm yea I think I would vote for some one like that, you know every thing he has said for the last 4 year has been lie after lie and thats a fact no ones making that up . if I were a demo rat I would be embarrassed of him and my party look at what it has become
Notice how MSNBC didn't air any of the minorities who spoke? Now there's the tolerant ones. Bill why is he left so angry? Because that's who they really are. You know when their leader is telling them if they bring a knife to the fight, you bring a gun. et in your neighbor's faces. Real class act our president is. The Romney's are refined and genuinely nice. That's not what money does,that's what faith does. Unlike the faith of the Reverend Wright.
Joe - Not sure why you reacted the way you did to Ducky's comment. Ann Romney's $80,000 deduction was a reference to her Olympic Dressage horse named Rafalca.
The Romney's really did get that big of a tax deduction for the horse. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/02/1116230/-Ann-Romney-s-Horse
"Sitting the trot" is a particularly challenging dressage move that can win valuable points in a competition. http://colleenkellyriderbiomechanics.com/2011/06/15/dressage-trot-sitting-the-trot-especially-in-difficult-extended-trot/
All Ducky was saying is that he was surprised they didn't have Ann ride in on her Olympic horse and perform a complex dressage move in front of the audience.
There was nothing "skanky" or "amoral" about his comment. It was a reference to the Romneys being so out of touch with the average American who doesn't get a $80,000 tax deduction for owning a dancing horse.
As always, your blog, your call. But I think you may have misinterpreted and overreacted just a tad.
XO: That was NOT what he was saying, and we both know it.
He was referencing her "supposed use of the horse" for MS rehabilitation. And if it cost $8.00 or $8,000,000.00 makes no difference, tax deduction or not.
That is the essence of his mind set and is the common theme on liberal blogs.
Tax deductions are not tax dodges, they are written into the law for a purpose and it is legitimate to use them as such.
(For the record, I think ALL tax deductions should be done away with and a flat tax be implemented for every dollar earned over the poverty level.)
Misdirect all you want, condescend all you want, that's the end of Ducky's reign on this blog.
It's a very sad state of affairs when we cannot get unbiased reporting from a major news network. No one has to wonder whether their persuasion is, it's so obvious that they are on the on the far left, bought and sold by the Obama camp. I can't wait to see the parade of idiots that will be on the Democratic Convention. I could probably write the article for you before it even happens. This may be your headline: THE DEMOCRATS COME THOUGH AGAIN! I happen to be an independent voter but after seeing this convention with all these honorable people speaking so eloquently and beautiful I'm more than ever persuaded to vote for Romney ticket. But that's easy to do in this election, I can honestly say that I'd vote for anyone bu Obama.... Why? Because I'm for America, not for election a man who wants to be the messiah of the world. . We Americans fell for the lie and we're paying for it. If we fall for it again, shame on us. I don't need to list of the incompetent actions and decisions to back this up for they have been written and mentioned time and time again.
I was born in Miami, Florida, the son of an Air Force officer, traveled the world, was saved at age 17, and have served the Lord since. That's me on the left and my lovely wife, Bonnie...the pretty one...on the right.
1. Absolutely no foul language (including the use of asterisks). If you are not man or woman enough to control your language, you are not welcome here...go somewhere else.
2. I am not looking for strings of commenters arguing with each other, so confine your comments to the topic at hand and address your comments to me, unless you can be exceptionally gracious and polite.
3. Since this is my blog, I am the sole arbiter of what can be placed on this blog. My decisions are final and without recourse. All anonymous comments, unsigned, will be deleted, as will ad hominem attacks against me or others.
4. Within the scope of those rules, you may feel free to have fun here (I sure will). Sarcasm, wit, half-wit, nit-wit, parody, satire, puns (especially puns), etc. are encouraged.
FOUR PRINCIPLES THAT DEFINE TRUE CONSERVATISM:
1. Respect for The Constitution
2. Respect for Life
3. The Smallest Possible Government
4. Individual Responsibility
This blog is about my philosophy of government, which is a very conservative philosophy.
You are not required to agree with me (although you would be better off if you did).
I am biased toward conservatism, and make no apologies for that.
Freedom means not being controlled by the government, that being the very reason we declared our independence from Great Britain.
Government's job is not to provide things for people, but to provide the opportunity for people to persue the things they want via the vehicles of freedom and responsibility.
FAIR USE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
17 comments:
You're gonna need a mighty big septic tank to absorb that much pure crap.
XO: How much of it do you really thing is pure?
Joe - I rarely say this here, but, good point.
After reading these comments I have to wonder, Why is the left so angry....? I thought they were all tree huggers for peace, love and equality even for all the illegal aliens, and the poor people who can't find their behinds with both hands. that Oblaaama is trying to change the laws to vote for him , mabe he thinks hes a king or a dictator....hummmm yea I think I would vote for some one like that, you know every thing he has said for the last 4 year has been lie after lie and thats a fact no ones making that up . if I were a demo rat I would be embarrassed of him and my party look at what it has become
Joe - Don't be a stranger.
Notice how MSNBC didn't air any of the minorities who spoke?
Now there's the tolerant ones.
Bill why is he left so angry? Because that's who they really are. You know when their leader is telling them if they bring a knife to the fight, you bring a gun. et in your neighbor's faces.
Real class act our president is. The Romney's are refined and genuinely nice. That's not what money does,that's what faith does.
Unlike the faith of the Reverend Wright.
Ducky and is this a poor reflection on democrats?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=aZjcFp60DJc
Question! If Obama wins a second term, who oh who will he blame for the bad economy he inherits?
Ducky: "Bummer, I thought they'd have Ann Romney ride in on her $80,000 tax deduction and immediately sit the trot before saluting the judges."
With that one comment you have demonstrated what a skanky, low life bag of barf you are.
The sad thing is, I believe that comment personifies the very heart of the left.
You are amoral, mindless pieces of swamp slime.
Ducky, you are no longer welcome on this blog.
Every future comment of yours will be deleted.
You present nothing of value, you present no argument, you present nothing related to the subject and you have less value than a dead slug.
Get lost...forever.
Joe - Not sure why you reacted the way you did to Ducky's comment. Ann Romney's $80,000 deduction was a reference to her Olympic Dressage horse named Rafalca.
The Romney's really did get that big of a tax deduction for the horse.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/02/1116230/-Ann-Romney-s-Horse
"Sitting the trot" is a particularly challenging dressage move that can win valuable points in a competition.
http://colleenkellyriderbiomechanics.com/2011/06/15/dressage-trot-sitting-the-trot-especially-in-difficult-extended-trot/
All Ducky was saying is that he was surprised they didn't have Ann ride in on her Olympic horse and perform a complex dressage move in front of the audience.
There was nothing "skanky" or "amoral" about his comment. It was a reference to the Romneys being so out of touch with the average American who doesn't get a $80,000 tax deduction for owning a dancing horse.
As always, your blog, your call. But I think you may have misinterpreted and overreacted just a tad.
XO: That was NOT what he was saying, and we both know it.
He was referencing her "supposed use of the horse" for MS rehabilitation. And if it cost $8.00 or $8,000,000.00 makes no difference, tax deduction or not.
That is the essence of his mind set and is the common theme on liberal blogs.
Tax deductions are not tax dodges, they are written into the law for a purpose and it is legitimate to use them as such.
(For the record, I think ALL tax deductions should be done away with and a flat tax be implemented for every dollar earned over the poverty level.)
Misdirect all you want, condescend all you want, that's the end of Ducky's reign on this blog.
Joe - You completely misread what Ducky was saying and over reacted, IMHO.
Sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar, Joe.
XO: As you travel the conservative blogosphere, you see Ducky's droppings everywhere, and they are acidic, caustic, snide and disingenuous.
Ducky is who Ducky is.
And now Ducky isn't.
It's a very sad state of affairs when we cannot get unbiased reporting from a major news network. No one has to wonder whether their persuasion is, it's so obvious that they are on the on the far left, bought and sold by the Obama camp. I can't wait to see the parade of idiots that will be on the Democratic Convention. I could probably write the article for you before it even happens. This may be your headline: THE DEMOCRATS COME THOUGH AGAIN! I happen to be an independent voter but after seeing this convention with all these honorable people speaking so eloquently and beautiful I'm more than ever persuaded to vote for Romney ticket. But that's easy to do in this election, I can honestly say that I'd vote for anyone bu Obama.... Why? Because I'm for America, not for election a man who wants to be the messiah of the world. . We Americans fell for the lie and we're paying for it. If we fall for it again, shame on us.
I don't need to list of the incompetent actions and decisions to back this up for they have been written and mentioned time and time again.
BG: The speakers were eloquent and persuasive.
The Dems will be accusatory and will have no plan.
ABO!
Joe - I don't really "travel the conservative blogosphere" Joe. I save all my love for you.
Post a Comment