Wednesday, August 15, 2012
FIRST SHE DIDN'T KNOW NOW SHE DOES
And with a straight face!
No wonder Democrat's credibility has faded.
Which time was she telling the truth?
Only her hairdresser knows for sure.
(And BTW, I'd fire that hair dresser if I were her).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Is Wasserman Shultz a member of the Obama Administration or a paid campaign staff member?
Yes or No?
If you answer Yes, you're a liar.
If you answer NO, then what exactly is your point?
Are our elected representatives not allowed to freely speak their minds without being construed to have their comments portrayed as putting words in the mouths of others?
XO: She is the Chairperson of the Democrat National Committee.
I never even hinted that she was part of the Administration, as any person able to read past as 2nd grade level could tell.
The point is, she is a liberal Democrat, a "leader" of Democrats and has her head screwed on the way liberal Democrats do.
Plus she has a bad hair do.
"Are our elected representatives not allowed to freely speak their minds without being construed to have their comments portrayed as putting words in the mouths of others?"
What does that even mean?
I just wonder why the Chairperson of the DNC does not know, and then knows ("of course")the affiliation of the PAC that produced that ad.
I knew their affiliation the first time I saw the ad.
I contend that the evidence shows she knew all along. She was just pretending that she didn't.
To a liberal, pretending something makes it true and if they pretend the opposite later, that's true, too.
Doesn't she sound like someone is pulling a string from her back and the recording plays?
Looking into this woman's eyes is like looking into the eyes of a bunny. I expect her to wiggle her nose.
LR: When you look closely and watch her body language, you see her dark side.
She takes every fact and monkey-wrenches it into a Democrat talking point.
And please stop insulting bunnies!
Post a Comment