Monday, August 20, 2012

HOW LIBERALS DEAL WITH DISAGREEMENTS.




You can't see it in yourselves and you will deny that you deal with them this way, but you do all the time.

14 comments:

Craig said...

How Conservatives deal with disagreements.

You can't see it in yourselves and you will deny that you deal with them this way, but you do all the time.

But seriously Joe, you like to attribute the actions of one dopey Lib to all Libs. It's not true that all Cons or libertarians would stomp on the head of a woman for carrying a sign (see video I linked). You are using the fallacy "poisoning the well". Discrediting a person or their argument before they speak.

Hows about an honest discussion of issues without childish rhetorical devices. Like how Romney/Ryan and the entire GOP want to throw granny off a cliff?

Joe said...

Craig: My own personal experience with liberals is that the moment I disagree with them they spit on me, either literally or emotionally with words and body language.

I just spoke with one yesterday and the minute I mentioned that I sided with Romney/Ryan, I was treated to vile language, inuendo and hatred.

That is a very common experience of mine. The testimony of my conservative friends bears this out.

It happens with great regularity on this blog, because liberals lead with emotions...always.

This vile person did not just speak, but she spit.

And that's dopey? No, it's vulgar and nasty.

Xavier Onassis said...

Joe - "My own personal experience with liberals is that the moment I disagree with them they spit on me, either literally or emotionally with words and body language.

It happens with great regularity on this blog, because liberals lead with emotions...always."

I don't know what liberals you are referring to. You have never been attacked by me, Craig or Ducky. We respond with actual, documented facts that disprove your trumped up, bogus "facts".

We simply point out to your readers when you have lied to them.

It's not emotional or personal, it's the pursuit of truth and honesty.

Ducky's here said...

I think you will find that XO is correct, Joe.

We sincerely wished you well when you had your surgery and I can say for sure that I don't go around spitting on people.

You do rely on these random indictments to generalize however. Just look at LR's "truths about Liberals". Can you honestly tell me there is a way to enter reasoned conversation with that type of person? No, you go to sarcasm out of frustration.

Lisa said...

Joe give them a litle credit,they just don't spit they deal with it from both ends

Ducky's here said...

Joe, notice the high tone of Lisa's post.

Now if you respond with humor, something like "You can tell she's either a Tea Begger or coprophagic" you risk getting censored.

Lone Ranger said...

Conservatives think, liberals feel. Liberals base their opinions on the opinions of other liberals. They have no facts on their side, so whenever they face opposition, they react with hatred. It's all they have. And, this blog is proof of that. The liberals who post here are invariably abusive, hateful and immature. They are incapable of conducting an adult conversation.

Lisa said...

Hey Ducky at least I know my link isn't a tea bagger,As I would like to call it "A Tea Party Patriot"

Ducky's here said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ducky's here said...

See, LR can only speak in cliches.

Conservatives think - liberals feel.

This from a guy who goes livid on his site that a Chicago Baskin-Robbins (not even in his neighborhood) put up a stone on the site of the Obamas' first date.

He then goes on to wonder why there isn't a stone commemorating Bain Capitol buying Dunkin' Brands (the parent) and saving it from bankruptcy.

LR was corrected, Carlyle Group(Daddy Bush's outfit) was the primary purchaser and in the tradition of Carlyle they purchased a highly profitable company they felt has growth potential. Dunkos was never in any financial danger.

Now, after his screed made purely on emotion and my reply based on fact ... crickets.

SWEET BABY JAMES said...

In reference to Harry Reid, the jackass who has accused Mitt Romney of not paying taxes by citing mysterious anonymous sources. Do you think that anyone believe this tripe?
Bottom line for you liberal Idiots think that since Romney violated no laws and only uses the Tax Code to legitimately pay his obligation he's guilty of nothing more than being responsible to himself. What would his detractors have him do; PAY EXTRA? In my opinion tax issues are between those obligated to pay tax and taxation authorities such as the IRS. How would one be expected to efficiently manage our National Resources if he didn't do likewise for himself. All of this $#!t is about making the case, promoted by B.O. and his minions, to advance "class warfare"! Lets get real, the real story is still the economy. Instead of these Mother Goose‎ fairy tales.
Now go back to cleaning out the subway toilets and worry about the Kenyan and his violation of our laws.

Ducky's here said...

off topic by I though you'd enjoy it, Joe. It was put up on the #OccupyBoston site.

Boston you're my home

Craig said...

Sweet Baby, All anyone is asking Romney do is follow the standard set by his father George and followed by every Pres. candidate since, release 10 years of tax returns. If Mitt really wanted to make Harry look bad, he can. Show us the proof.

Romney's already a proven liar, why would you take his word on anything?

Leticia said...

I would have pressed charges, not just have escorted her out. That's a form of assault.

You cannot simply spit on someone and get away with it. Spit can carry viruses, etc.

Stupid woman.