Thursday, July 18, 2013

JUSTICE AND THE RELATIVITY OF LIBERALS

Liberals believe that if you are young and have a bag of Skittles and a can of soda you should be able to go anywhere you want to go, do what you want to do, and look like what you want to look like, including wearing clothing that keeps you from being identified.

Liberals also believe that with all of that you should be able go into neighborhoods that you don't usually frequent, walk between houses, look into windows and hide from any onlookers.

Liberals further believe that a young person who does all of those things, then doubles back on the guy appointed to keep a watch on the neighborhood, breaks his nose, pounds his head on the concrete or asphalt, and beats him mercilessly just because he was being followed, is somehow a victim when he is shot in self defense.

Liberals believe that in a state that allows the legal carrying of firearms by  qualified people, there are some people who should not be allowed to carry those firearms except in circumstances in which liberals approve.

Liberals believe that Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law should be rolled back to the federal law levels which require the victim of an attack to try to flee before using force, especially deadly force, to defend himself, thus placing the burden on the victim instead of the perpetrator.

Liberals do not believe in the rule of law. They believe in "majority rule," the very thing the Republic was formed to avoid. They believe that after a fair trial, they should be able to overturn a verdict if they think it fitting.

Liberals further believe that if you don't like the verdict in a jury trial you should rise up in protest, destroy other people's property, beat people up (Chicago and Los Angeles) with whom you disagree, and steal merchandise from stores, because that will even the score.

Liberals believe that it is proper to cause a man who was found not guilty by a court of law to have to live the rest of his life in fear because they do not like the verdict of that trial.

Liberals believe that a single case self defense in Florida is far more important than the 700+ murders that have taken place in the inner cities of places like Chicago, Houston, Atlanta, New York, Detroit, etc.

Liberals believe that if the MainStream Media says a case is on the minds of everyone, it is on the minds of everyone, in spite of the fact that it is on the minds of everyone because, and only because the MainStream Media put it on the minds of everyone. The MSM doesn't seem it important to put the other killings in the country on the minds of everyone.

Liberals believe that the value of human life is relative. They believe that some human life is more important than other human life. A troubled teen's life, for instance, is more important than the life of an average citizen who is trying to keep his neighborhood a safe place to set up residence. They do not recognize equality of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Liberals believe the president and/or the DOJ should step in and do something, even if it's wrong.

Liberals have a sick, un-American mind set, as evidenced by their reaction to the George Zimmerman verdict in a court of law.

9 comments:

Philip Gordon said...

You know Joe, I'm friggen sick of these dumb ass libs already trying to make hay out of this verdict. It's done and over and getting tiresome already.
These Black race baiters ate always throwing fuel on the fire.
As with all issues that become politicized, these liberal bleeding heats of this debate are ignoring all facts that don't support their position. I never know whether they are purposely ignoring all the facts or whether their ideology somehow short-circuits their intellectual capacity to do so, that's always been a source of fascination to me.
The bottom line is that two young guys did stupid things. Both of them. One of the guys had a legal gun in a legal situation and (per proper legal proceedings) used it legally, to defend himself from a thug who was looking for trouble.. And the trouble maker is dead as a result. I have no doubt the guy with the gun wishes the whole friggen thing hadn't happened, and that he had found something better to do that night.
But it did happen and the trial is over and the jury had it's say. Why do these fools always think that the jury must agree with them or else!
It's a crappy, tragic situation that does not lend itself to simple answers, yet it has become a simplistic political pawn for no other reason than the color of the young guys skin.

That won't stop the insults and finger-pointing, of course, because the race pimps and the division pimps have done such a good job that insults and finger-pointing are ingrained in our public discourse. We're playing right into their game like good little sheep, and I'm sure they appreciate it every time they check their bank account balances.
But they continue to play the "IF" game like "IF" Zimmerman didn't follow him or "IF" Zimmerman didn't get out of his car!

How about "IF" the punk didn't go to that community looking for trouble in the first place and "IF" he didn't punch Zimmerman in the face. Or "IF" he didn't say "Your gonna DIE tonight?
The circus trial of George Zimmerman has ended, but the Blacks and white liberals won’t accept the fact that the (the creepy ass cracka) was found Not guilty.
As the evidence was presented in the Martin/Zimmerman, it became very clear that this case was so weak it should not have even been brought to trial. But white liberals in conjunction with Black America’s RACIST side and demanded Zimmerman be found guilty. Why? Do white liberals really care about black teens being killed? Yes, they do. But only if the killing occurs at the hand of a white person. White-on-black crime in America is so rare that white liberals had to construe Hispanic George Zimmerman as a “White Hispanic” to get blacks upset and all riled up over the case. And guess what? It worked!
Why is the only answer ALWAYS is to blame Whitey? Or as some will say, to blame the Crazy Ass Cracker?

sue hanes said...

Joe - This Liberal does not believe that the president should step in and say something about this case. I believe he should stay out of it. The DOJ too.

Xavier Onassis said...

Joe - :: sigh ::

"Liberals believe that if you are young and have a bag of Skittles and a can of soda you should be able to go anywhere you want to go, do what you want to do, and look like what you want to look like, including wearing clothing that keeps you from being identified."

No, a bag of Skittles and a soda are not required. Any American should be able to do this. It's called Freedom. I thought you were a fan of Freedom.

"Liberals also believe that with all of that you should be able go into neighborhoods that you don't usually frequent, walk between houses, look into windows and hide from any onlookers."

Trayvon Martin DID frequent that neighborhood because his father lived there! He wasn't walking between houses, looking into windows or hiding from onlookers. He was walking down the street on his way home.

"Liberals further believe that a young person who does all of those things, then doubles back on the guy appointed to keep a watch on the neighborhood, breaks his nose, pounds his head on the concrete or asphalt, and beats him mercilessly just because he was being followed, is somehow a victim when he is shot in self defense."

Let me ask you this Joe. If you were walking down a street in your neighborhood at night and found that you were being followed by a black male that you didn't know, wouldn't YOU feel threatened? Wouldn't you want to Stand Your Ground against that threat?

"Liberals believe that in a state that allows the legal carrying of firearms by qualified people, there are some people who should not be allowed to carry those firearms except in circumstances in which liberals approve."

Yes. There should be strict restrictions on who should be allowed to carry loaded guns in public spaces.

"Liberals believe that Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law should be rolled back to the federal law levels which require the victim of an attack to try to flee before using force, especially deadly force, to defend himself, thus placing the burden on the victim instead of the perpetrator."

Yes. Combining Concealed Carry laws with Stand Your Ground Laws is MADNESS! Anyone who feels threatened by someone else can draw and shoot as they see fit. Anyone in the vicinity who feels threatened by that can ALSO draw and shoot as they see fit. Repeat, repeat, repeat.

Arming the average idiot and giving them carte blanche to kill anyone that they feel threatened by is INSANE!

"Liberals do not believe in the rule of law. They believe in "majority rule," the very thing the Republic was formed to avoid. They believe that after a fair trial, they should be able to overturn a verdict if they think it fitting."

All court verdicts are subject to Appeal, That's the law. No verdict is final until the Supreme Court hands down a verdict.

"Liberals further believe that if you don't like the verdict in a jury trial you should rise up in protest, destroy other people's property, beat people up (Chicago and Los Angeles) with whom you disagree, and steal merchandise from stores, because that will even the score."

There isn't any Liberal anywhere who supports that nonsense. That's a lie.

Xavier Onassis said...

Joe - cont'd

"Liberals believe that it is proper to cause a man who was found not guilty by a court of law to have to live the rest of his life in fear because they do not like the verdict of that trial."

No, we don't. But since you conservatives are hell bent on handing out guns to anyone who wants one and allowing them immunity from arrest or prosecution if they claim they are threatened and are Standing Their Ground...well...you made that bed. Sleep in it.

"Liberals believe that a single case self defense in Florida is far more important than the 700+ murders that have taken place in the inner cities of places like Chicago, Houston, Atlanta, New York, Detroit, etc."

Apples and oranges.

"Liberals believe that if the MainStream Media says a case is on the minds of everyone, it is on the minds of everyone, in spite of the fact that it is on the minds of everyone because, and only because the MainStream Media put it on the minds of everyone. The MSM doesn't seem it important to put the other killings in the country on the minds of everyone."

Break out the tin foil hats and protect us from the "MainStream (i.e. legitimate) Media"! Because they are drowning out the Breitbarts, Drudges and Alex Jones' with their nefarious facts!

"Liberals believe that the value of human life is relative. They believe that some human life is more important than other human life. A troubled teen's life, for instance, is more important than the life of an average citizen who is trying to keep his neighborhood a safe place to set up residence. They do not recognize equality of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

No, you are thinking about conservatives. They are the ones who believe that "the value of human life is relative".

Conservatives think that a clump of unfeeling, unthinking, undifferentiated cells has rights that trump those of a full grown human beings whose lives can be unalterably changed, forever, by that unconscious blastocyst. Conservatives think that little clump of calls must ABSOLUTELY grow into a full grown human being no matter what the cost to other human beings.

But, once it's born, any idiot with a CCW permit who feels threatened under a Stand Your Ground law can kill it with immunity. Hypocrites.

"Liberals believe the president and/or the DOJ should step in and do something, even if it's wrong."

Liberals (and The Supreme Court) believe that Federal Law trumps State Law and if State Law or lower courts get it wrong, they can be corrected.

"Liberals have a sick, un-American mind set, as evidenced by their reaction to the George Zimmerman verdict in a court of law."

Liberals are true to the American promise of freedom and equality to all. Conservatives are racist fascists who want a return to the "good old days" when any white man was free to bring frontier justice any black man as he saw fit.

Xavier Onassis said...

Philop - "How about "IF" the punk didn't go to that community looking for trouble in the first place..."

HE WAS WALKING HOME TO HIS FATHER'S HOUSE AFTER BUYING SOME SKITTLES AND ICE TEA TO WATCH THE NBA PLAYOFFS!

How is that "looking for trouble"?

The only person "looking for trouble" was the cop wannabe carrying a loaded weapon following an innocent citizen.

Anonymous said...

They had no case at all. Those pesky things we call “facts” and “evidence”, were all on Zimmermans side. But go ahead, try on your theory for size.

As for the "PUNK TRAVON" whats his face! Pinning some creepy-ass cracker to the ground and trying to murder him by repeatedly banging his head against the concrete, is not exactly what I’d call a innocent “boy” waling around with skittles and iced tea.
And as for the Civil Tights violation that us liberal want the Justice Dept to file, let us not forget that a problem with a civil suit the defense can hammer Trayvon and all the evidence (the texting for guns, the drugs, suspension from school, punching the school bus driver, the stolen jewelry etc etc) that was not allowed in the criminal trial against George Zimmerman to paint a not-so-rosey picture of Trayvon, CAN BE ALLOWED in this one... so it might not be such a wise move after all.

Gordon's View said...

Well, the circus trial of George Zimmerman has ended, but the Black and white liberals won’t accept the fact that the (the creepy ass cracka) was found Not guilty.
As the evidence was presented in the Martin/Zimmerman, it became very clear that this case was so weak it should not have even been brought to trial. But white liberals in conjunction with Black America’s RACIST side and demanded Zimmerman be found guilty. Why? Do white liberals really care about black teens being killed? Yes, they do. But only if the killing occurs at the hand of a white person. White-on-black crime in America is so rare that white liberals had to construe Hispanic George Zimmerman as a “White Hispanic” to get blacks upset and all riled up over the case. And guess what? It worked!
Why is the only answer ALWAYS is to blame Whitey? Or as some will say, to blame the Crazy Ass Cracker?

Joe said...

XO: I take it you were at the trial and heard things there that nobody, but nobody else heard.

The jury (that actually WAS there) heard the evidence and brought back the verdict.

If you can't live with the jury system, move to a place that doesn't have one.

Xavier Onassis said...

Joe - "The jury (that actually WAS there) heard the evidence and brought back the verdict.

If you can't live with the jury system, move to a place that doesn't have one."

I'm curious Joe. How did you feel about the jury verdict in the O.J. Simpson trial? Were you all "well, the jury has spoken. If they say he's not guilty then he's not guilty! End of story!"

Are you so idiotic and naive to believe that the jury ALWAYS reaches the right verdict?

What about all of those jury verdicts down in your part of the country that concluded if a white man said a black man raped a white woman, that was all the evidence the jury needed to find the defendant guilty and hang him from a tree on the courthouse square?

Questionable jury verdicts must ALWAYS be questioned and appealed to insure that true justice is done.