Monday, July 22, 2013

Bill Whittle on Zimmerman

17 comments:

Lone Ranger said...

As usual with liberals, they aren't talking about the actual event but have changed the conversation to gun control (again) and the stand your ground laws. Well, the stand your ground law had no part in this shooting. How do you retreat when you are flat on your back with a young Barack Obama (his claim) straddling your chest and beating your head into the pavement?

I'd just like to ask a few questions of the race hustlers out there. If you were accused of a crime that could put you away for life, would you want the prosecutor to skip the grand jury process and go directly to trial? That's what happened to Zimmerman.

In the trial, would you want the prosecution to withhold evidence that could be exculpatory? That's what happened to Zimmerman.

During the trial, would you want the national media to fraudulently paint you as a racist? That's what they did to Zimmerman. In fact, the media was so desperate to inject racism into the trial that they invented a new ethnic class, "white Hispanic." Not even a white Hispanic-American. I guess that makes Obama a white African.

Anyone with a shred of common sense can see how ridiculous this who case is.

That leaves out liberals.

Gordon's View said...

Poor Obama the community agitator, he's just doing the best he can to pacify and mollify the angry masses. He just can't win for losing at this point. I'll bet he is so looking forward to 1/20/17.
Ya know what? SO AM I.

Glenn E. Chatfield said...

X.O. claims this video is nonsense. Liberals just don't like hearing the truth.

John Q Voter said...

Race Warfare only drives a wedge deep in the progress that has taken centuries to achieve. They have riled up the youth so much that they have taken to the streets with flash mobs. Reverse Racism, if you want to call it that, is more dangerous. It is also their way of holding back the progress of their own race, but it does secure votes. As in the 2008 elections, 95% of African Americans voted for Obama. To secure and keep 11% of the people delusional and disenfranchised is sick and abusive. It is inciting and terroristic (if there is such a word), And it is already showing results of violence. But NO where has the Tea Party demonstrated one inkling of racism. All the Tea Party wants is Legitimate representation and Responsible legislation.
On another note, Rachel Jeantel wasn't consistent with her testimony. She actually admitted to lying twice. The defense didn't treat her any differently because she is black than they would treat any unintelligible white person. They are a defense team its their job and they did it well. It's also interesting how people keep trying to make this about Zimmerman profiling.
As for the dummy who said that she was very intelligent because she spoke 3 languages, tell me just how intelligent is someone wh says, "I aint .cummin bak tumorraw"?

Ducky's here said...

Tom Tomorrow on Zimmerman

Xavier Onassis said...

None of the crap that Whittle and the rabid right wing bigots dredge up or manufacture about Martin has any impact on what happened ON THAT NIGHT.

ON THAT NIGHT, was Trayvon Martin doing anything illegal or even remotely suspicious?

NO. He was not.

ON THAT NIGHT, did George Zimmerman have any legitimate reason to be following Trayvon Martin?

NO. He did not.

ON THAT NIGHT, did Trayvon Martin have reason to believe that the person following him posed a real and immediate threat to his personal safety?

YES. He did.

ON THAT NIGHT, if Zimmerman hadn't murdered Martin for being black could Martin have used the "Stand Your Ground" defense against the threat presented by George Zimmerman?

YES. He could.

The so called "evidence" that Whittle spins to his own agenda wasn't admitted because it wasn't "evidence" in the events that took place ON THAT NIGHT.

But you still got the unjust, racist, jury verdict that you wanted so why are you still complaining about it?

When selling anything, including points of view, there is a cardinal rule:

"Don't talk past the close!"

That means "once you get what you want and seal the deal, SHUT UP before you screw it up!"

Glenn E. Chatfield said...

X.O.

Zimmerman did NOT go after Trayvon because he was black. He is NOT a racist. Nothing in the trial ever showed it was because he was black. Nothing in Zimmerman's history even hints at racism.

Race-baiters like you are a major part of the problem in this country.

http://townhall.com/columnists/jackiegingrichcushman/2013/07/25/the-question-should-be-why-n1648180/page/full

Xavier Onassis said...

G.E.C. - Once again, you are hilarious.

The whole point of this Whittle video was to dredge up all sort crap, much of it made up out of whole cloth, to paiint Trayvon Martin as a criminal thug who deserved to be gunned down in the street like a rabid animal.

Of course, none of this made it's way to the courtroom because it didn't meet evidentiary standards and was irrelevent to the case before the court.

But you, Joe and Whittle want it considered anyway.

But when I point out that THE ONLY reason Zimmerman was following Trayvon was because he was black, all of a sudden you're all "Oh no! There was no evidence of that in the courtroom, therefore it isn't true!"

You can't have it both ways.

If Trayvon were a white kid wearing a polo shirt Zimmerman wouldn't have given him a second look and would not have beenfollowing him.

Glenn E. Chatfield said...

If Trayvon had not been the sort of thug that he was, he never would have been paranoid about being followed, nor would he have turned back to confront Zimmerman in an aggressive manner.

If Trayvon had been white and actions the same, Zimmerman would have done the same thing. Skin color didn't matter to him, as has been demonstrated over and over again.

But liberals like you can't accept the facts, and everything has to be about race.

Xavier Onassis said...

G.E.C. - Trayvon Martin felt threatened and Stood His Ground against the perceived threat.

These sorts of confrontations are going to increase because people like you seem to think the way to solve the problem of violence in our streets is to give everybody a gun and the permission to open fire at anything that scares them.

Be careful what you ask for. You might just get it.

Glenn E. Chatfield said...

X.O.
Martin did NOT stand his ground. he turned around and confronted aggressively. He could have continued on his way but he chose poorly.

Your last statement only demonstrates your ignorance of what people like me really think.

Xavier Onassis said...

G.E.C. - Under Florida's Stand Your Ground law, Trayvon Martin had no obligation to retreat from the threat he perceived from George Zimmerman, a dark skinned Hispanic stranger following him with a suspicious bulge on his belt (which turned out to be a loaded, semi-automatic pistol).

And your last statement demonstrates your inability to actually think.

Glenn E. Chatfield said...

X.O.

We aren't talking about standing one's ground - Martin didn't "stand" his ground, he advanced towards Zimmerman. HELLO!!!!!!!

And I'm sure he couldn't see any bulge of a gun.

You really are as stupid as I thought you were!

Xavier Onassis said...

G.E.C. - "We aren't talking about standing one's ground - Martin didn't "stand" his ground, he advanced towards Zimmerman. HELLO!!!!!!!"

That is what Zimmerman claimed. Let's see what Martin said. Oh...wait...we can't...because he's DEAD!

That leaves Zimmerman free to make up any story he chooses.

Lone Ranger said...

Gee, the libs didn't answer even ONE of my questions. I feel SO left out!

Xavier Onassis said...

Tonto's Catcher - That's because your "questions" were stupid and irrelevant.

Ralph said...

This is cool!