Monday, April 2, 2012


The following is an article from Hot Air by John Hawkins.

The article begins with a quote from President BO (the child president):

"We won’t win the race for new jobs and new businesses and middle-class security if we cling to this same old, worn-out, tired `you’re on your own’ economics that the other side is peddling. It was tried in the decades before the Great Depression. It didn’t work then. It was tried in the last decade. It didn’t work. You know, the idea you would keep on doing the same thing over and over again, even though it’s been proven not to work. That’s a sign of madness.” — Barack Obama

Hear that?

According to the worst President in American history, “you’re on your own” economics, which apparently extended from the founding of the country until the day Barack Obama took office, didn’t work. Sure, it produced the most technologically advanced nation on the planet, the world’s largest economy, and made us into a super power, but that’s “madness” compared to Obamanomics, which cost us our AAA credit rating, has produced the longest streak of above 8% unemployment since the Great Depression, and is on track to produce 13 trillion dollars of debt over the next 10 years.
Listening to Barack Obama lecture ANYONE else on economics is like getting a lecture from Jimmy Carter on the proper way to execute a hostage rescue.

What’s up next? Will we have Bill Maher explaining civility? Will Keith Olbermann be coming along to explain proper workplace etiquette? Hey, Champ, maybe this wasn’t explained to you at Harvard, but when you’re in the process of decimating the country’s economy through your own incompetence, people may be a little dubious when you tell them going a different way would be “madness.”

John Hawkins is a professional writer who runs Right Wing News and Linkiest. He’s also the co-owner of the The Looking Spoon. You can hear more from John Hawkins on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, G+, You Tube, & at PJ Media.

End of Article

President BO (the child president) refuses to look at the results of actions by those who came before him (except, of course, for blaming George W. Bush for everything).

Why can't liberals see that the way out of these economic doldrums is to increase freedom instead of regulations and to reduce taxes, thus increasing the tax base which would result in an increase in revenues?


Looking 4 Answers said...

Just in case you haven't yet heard, Keith Olbermann was fired because of you righteous Repubs.

Joe said...

L4A: "...Olbermann was fired because of you righteous Repubs."

Didn't happen.

When you call us "righteous Repubs," does that mean you are admitting to unrighteousness?

Are you saying that being "unrighteous" is better than being "righteous?"

Looking 4 Answers said...

I am not a betting person by nature, but based on the current weak field of GOP candidates, combined with the death of Bin Laden, and the killing of an totally innocent black youngster, I would be willing to bet that Obama has easily secured his second term. In fact I'd say he is a shoe-in.

Joe said...

L4A: Do you have the intelligence to know that a PARKED car is virtually harmless (see previous post's comment section)?

" totally innocent black youngster..."

"an" totally innocent? You must be a product of government schools.

First of all, there has been no indictment, no trial and no verdict, yet you form a conclusion from media factoids.

That's called "prejudice" and is not appropriate to our legal system.

As for President BO (the child president), we'll see about that.

The death of OBL is his ONLY success, and that was not even his to claim. But he claimed it anyway.

Looking 4 Answers said...

Yes, Keith Olbermann was fired because of you righteous Repubs, and the war between Repubs(America Haters) and the Democrats is just getting started.
And it sounds to me like you people on the radical right are getting a bit nervous. But no wonder with that bunch of lousy candidate you have fighting for the right beat the President.
Did you see the latest polls where the President is beating Romney by 9 points?

Joe said...

L4A: "Did you see the latest polls where the President is beating Romney by 9 points?"

Yeah, I saw it.

Is it November already?

I must have missed April, May, June, July, August, September and October.

Oh, and you didn't answer my questions.

Don't you know the answers?

Anonymous said...

Everything in story smells very much like a rodent.