Do you Honestly believe that he had any intention of answering the question.
In your opinion, did he answer it?
What other aspects of the English language are there about which you have no idea?
Come on...you can't be serious.
No one with one iota of intellect could miss that Holder was trying his best (which isn't saying that much) to be as evasive as possible and NEVER answer the question.
And you think that's OK?
I hope you are kidding.
We don't need a world full of people who think they're smart but who are not intelligent enough to recognize dancing around a question when they see it.
4 comments:
Honestly, you have to wonder who he worships.
He worships the god of evasivity, and has ascended to the Grande Poughbah level.
How many times have we been told that in order to deal with a problem, you must first admit you have one? Would it not be reasonable to have a corollary in this, that in order to identify the problem you have to call it by name?
Nobody in DC is willing to say who the problem is. They dodge it just like a drunk dodges being an alcoholic. Ignoring the problem won't make it go away.
If they were looking to build some level of trust in their ability to handle the problem then this should be a key example of what not to do. This surely is driving people to the lacking trust side of the spectrum.
Do you think they'd EVER let him go over this incident? Some Conservatives are rumoring that but I can't see it.
Post a Comment