Joe - Yes - I vote that RS crossed the line by putting him on their cover.
But I didn't have to watch Judge Jeannine's excellent vidoe to make up my mind. I decided the instant I saw the cover. Rolling Stone made a big mistake.
Sorry Joe, I couldn't listen to much. She piles so much extraneous junk on a simple issue.
Rolling Stone wrote a story and they designed a cover that would sell magazines, especially to their demographic. I'm not going to get excited about that.
What the right WILL NOT talk about, however, is the content of the story which does take a point of view that I support. This pathology could not have been generated by radical fundamentalism alone. There were serious mental health issues and these two were little different than the perpetrator of a mass shooting.
The right is not interested in understanding and simply wants to generate false indignity, not helpful.
As always, this idiot misses the point of the article.
OH! You didn't know?? There was actually an ARTICLE. A bit of actual journalism that expounded and explained on WHY he was on the cover.
The whole point in a nutshell is this.
The people who "hate America" aren't just bearded Middle Eastern Muslims wearing a western sport coat over a traditional thawb, screaming hysterically and waving the Koran over burning American flags.
Sometimes, it's the kid next door who comes from a good family, attends a good school and appears to be a mostly normal kid.
The mother of a Benghazi victim is furious about the new White House strategy of calling the terrorist attack and many other scandals plaguing the Obama administration “fake” or “phony.” Patricia Smith, mother of Sean Smith, who was slain in the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack, lashed out on “Your World” on the Fox News Channel about that terminology. President Obama has never revealed what, if anything, he was doing while workers at the Benghazi embassy were urgently requesting support, nor has the administration explained why no forces were sent to protect the embassy
Anonymous - All of the information on Benghazi is out there. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge it and keep harping on it like a one string banjo is what makes it a phony controversy.
Even Darrell Issa has given up trying to make a mountain out of that molehill. Maybe you should too.
I was born in Miami, Florida, the son of an Air Force officer, traveled the world, was saved at age 17, and have served the Lord since. That's me on the left and my lovely wife, Bonnie...the pretty one...on the right.
1. Absolutely no foul language (including the use of asterisks). If you are not man or woman enough to control your language, you are not welcome here...go somewhere else.
2. I am not looking for strings of commenters arguing with each other, so confine your comments to the topic at hand and address your comments to me, unless you can be exceptionally gracious and polite.
3. Since this is my blog, I am the sole arbiter of what can be placed on this blog. My decisions are final and without recourse. All anonymous comments, unsigned, will be deleted, as will ad hominem attacks against me or others.
4. Within the scope of those rules, you may feel free to have fun here (I sure will). Sarcasm, wit, half-wit, nit-wit, parody, satire, puns (especially puns), etc. are encouraged.
FOUR PRINCIPLES THAT DEFINE TRUE CONSERVATISM:
1. Respect for The Constitution
2. Respect for Life
3. The Smallest Possible Government
4. Individual Responsibility
This blog is about my philosophy of government, which is a very conservative philosophy.
You are not required to agree with me (although you would be better off if you did).
I am biased toward conservatism, and make no apologies for that.
Freedom means not being controlled by the government, that being the very reason we declared our independence from Great Britain.
Government's job is not to provide things for people, but to provide the opportunity for people to persue the things they want via the vehicles of freedom and responsibility.
FAIR USE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
9 comments:
Joe - Yes - I vote that RS crossed the line by putting him on their cover.
But I didn't have to watch Judge Jeannine's excellent vidoe to make up my mind. I decided the instant I saw the cover. Rolling Stone made a big mistake.
Sorry Joe, I couldn't listen to much. She piles so much extraneous junk on a simple issue.
Rolling Stone wrote a story and they designed a cover that would sell magazines, especially to their demographic. I'm not going to get excited about that.
What the right WILL NOT talk about, however, is the content of the story which does take a point of view that I support. This pathology could not have been generated by radical fundamentalism alone.
There were serious mental health issues and these two were little different than the perpetrator of a mass shooting.
The right is not interested in understanding and simply wants to generate false indignity, not helpful.
Ducky: The left is not interested in understanding...
As always, this idiot misses the point of the article.
OH! You didn't know?? There was actually an ARTICLE. A bit of actual journalism that expounded and explained on WHY he was on the cover.
The whole point in a nutshell is this.
The people who "hate America" aren't just bearded Middle Eastern Muslims wearing a western sport coat over a traditional thawb, screaming hysterically and waving the Koran over burning American flags.
Sometimes, it's the kid next door who comes from a good family, attends a good school and appears to be a mostly normal kid.
That was the point.
Oh so she missed the point. And. An idiot like you gets it? Wrong!
Anonymous - Yes. I got it right (having actually read the article), and she got it wrong (having only seen the cover and jumped to conclusions).
I can pull a dozen random people off the street who have a better grasp on reality than that crazy lady.
The mother of a Benghazi victim is furious about the new White House strategy of calling the terrorist attack and many other scandals plaguing the Obama administration “fake” or “phony.” Patricia Smith, mother of Sean Smith, who was slain in the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack, lashed out on “Your World” on the Fox News Channel about that terminology. President Obama has never revealed what, if anything, he was doing while workers at the Benghazi embassy were urgently requesting support, nor has the administration explained why no forces were sent to protect the embassy
Anonymous - All of the information on Benghazi is out there. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge it and keep harping on it like a one string banjo is what makes it a phony controversy.
Even Darrell Issa has given up trying to make a mountain out of that molehill. Maybe you should too.
Get used to it, XO.
We're going to hear about Benghazi right through Hillary's administration.
Post a Comment