Monday, July 22, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Where I give you my slightly quirky opinion, and you can give me yours, as long as you're man or woman enough to be civil and control your language.
Time (EST)
About Me
- Joe
- I was born in Miami, Florida, the son of an Air Force officer, traveled the world, was saved at age 17, and have served the Lord since. That's me on the left and my lovely wife, Bonnie...the pretty one...on the right.
There Are But A Few Rules To Follow
1. Absolutely no foul language (including the use of asterisks). If you are not man or woman enough to control your language, you are not welcome here...go somewhere else.
2. I am not looking for strings of commenters arguing with each other, so confine your comments to the topic at hand and address your comments to me, unless you can be exceptionally gracious and polite.
3. Since this is my blog, I am the sole arbiter of what can be placed on this blog. My decisions are final and without recourse. All anonymous comments, unsigned, will be deleted, as will ad hominem attacks against me or others.
4. Within the scope of those rules, you may feel free to have fun here (I sure will). Sarcasm, wit, half-wit, nit-wit, parody, satire, puns (especially puns), etc. are encouraged.
FOUR PRINCIPLES THAT DEFINE TRUE CONSERVATISM:
1. Respect for The Constitution
2. Respect for Life
3. The Smallest Possible Government
4. Individual Responsibility
This blog is about my philosophy of government, which is a very conservative philosophy.
You are not required to agree with me (although you would be better off if you did).
I am biased toward conservatism, and make no apologies for that.
Freedom means not being controlled by the government, that being the very reason we declared our independence from Great Britain.
2. I am not looking for strings of commenters arguing with each other, so confine your comments to the topic at hand and address your comments to me, unless you can be exceptionally gracious and polite.
3. Since this is my blog, I am the sole arbiter of what can be placed on this blog. My decisions are final and without recourse. All anonymous comments, unsigned, will be deleted, as will ad hominem attacks against me or others.
4. Within the scope of those rules, you may feel free to have fun here (I sure will). Sarcasm, wit, half-wit, nit-wit, parody, satire, puns (especially puns), etc. are encouraged.
FOUR PRINCIPLES THAT DEFINE TRUE CONSERVATISM:
1. Respect for The Constitution
2. Respect for Life
3. The Smallest Possible Government
4. Individual Responsibility
This blog is about my philosophy of government, which is a very conservative philosophy.
You are not required to agree with me (although you would be better off if you did).
I am biased toward conservatism, and make no apologies for that.
Freedom means not being controlled by the government, that being the very reason we declared our independence from Great Britain.
Government's job is not to provide things for people, but to provide the opportunity for people to persue the things they want via the vehicles of freedom and responsibility.
Some of My Favorite Bloggers
NATIONAL BLOGS & STUFF
- American Spectator
- American Thinker
- Big Government (Breitbart)
- Big Journalism
- Breitbart TV
- CNS News
- Cato Institute
- Contact Your Congressperson
- Contact your Senator
- Daily Caller
- Darwin's God
- Drudge Report
- Everything About Congress!
- Fox Nation
- Gateway Pundit
- Heritage Foundation
- Hot Air
- Insta Pundit
- Joe's Jottings (My Other Blog)
- Kingdom FM Christian Radio
- Mark Levin
- Michelle Malkin
- News Max
- NewsBusters
- On Racism & Republicans
- Politico
- Real Clear Politics
- Right Scoop, The
- Rush Limbaugh
- Sean Hannity
- WINK News Radio
- Wall Builders (A Web Site)
- Weekly Standard
- What's Happening in Congress
SPECIAL STUDIES
BHO-THE CONSUMATE AMATEUR
WHY I CALL HIM "PRESIDENT BO"
I call him "President" out of respect for the office. I call him "BO" (as in Body Odor) because his agenda stinks.
I also refer to him as our "Acting President."
I also refer to him as our "Acting President."
SPECIAL REPORT
The Obama Dictionary
IF YOU REALLY WANT TO LEARN, READ THESE
FAIR USE
FAIR USE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Former Features to Visit or Revisit
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(269)
-
▼
July
(20)
- SOMETHING I THOUGHT YOU SHOULD READ
- SUNDAY RESPITE-I've Just Seen Jesus-Sandy Patti & ...
- HOW THE PRESIDENT PROMOTES PEACE
- JUDGE JEANINE ON ROLLING STONE'S COVER
- Bill Whittle on Zimmerman
- SUNDAY RESPITE-Jesus On the Mainline-Gaither Vocal...
- HOW TO RUN A CITY (INTO THE GROUND)
- JUST A FEW? HUNDREDS GO UNREPORTED.
- JUSTICE AND THE RELATIVITY OF LIBERALS
- FIRST RESPONDERS
- SUNDAY RESPITE-On My Knees-Jaci Velasquez
- A PARABLE FOR OUR COUNTRY
- THE DECLARATION AND THE CONSTITUTION Part 2
- LINCOLN'S SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS
- THE PICTURE OF TOLERANCE & FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS
- SUNDAY RESPITE-Declare His Glory-Prestonwood Bapti...
- The Declaration and the Constitution
- CELEBRATING OUR INDEPENDENCE-Recommend Watching Fu...
- THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
- JUST SITTING AROUND
-
▼
July
(20)
IMPORTANT FEATURED ARTICLES FROM OTHERS
Visitors Since 02-04-10
17 comments:
As usual with liberals, they aren't talking about the actual event but have changed the conversation to gun control (again) and the stand your ground laws. Well, the stand your ground law had no part in this shooting. How do you retreat when you are flat on your back with a young Barack Obama (his claim) straddling your chest and beating your head into the pavement?
I'd just like to ask a few questions of the race hustlers out there. If you were accused of a crime that could put you away for life, would you want the prosecutor to skip the grand jury process and go directly to trial? That's what happened to Zimmerman.
In the trial, would you want the prosecution to withhold evidence that could be exculpatory? That's what happened to Zimmerman.
During the trial, would you want the national media to fraudulently paint you as a racist? That's what they did to Zimmerman. In fact, the media was so desperate to inject racism into the trial that they invented a new ethnic class, "white Hispanic." Not even a white Hispanic-American. I guess that makes Obama a white African.
Anyone with a shred of common sense can see how ridiculous this who case is.
That leaves out liberals.
Poor Obama the community agitator, he's just doing the best he can to pacify and mollify the angry masses. He just can't win for losing at this point. I'll bet he is so looking forward to 1/20/17.
Ya know what? SO AM I.
X.O. claims this video is nonsense. Liberals just don't like hearing the truth.
Race Warfare only drives a wedge deep in the progress that has taken centuries to achieve. They have riled up the youth so much that they have taken to the streets with flash mobs. Reverse Racism, if you want to call it that, is more dangerous. It is also their way of holding back the progress of their own race, but it does secure votes. As in the 2008 elections, 95% of African Americans voted for Obama. To secure and keep 11% of the people delusional and disenfranchised is sick and abusive. It is inciting and terroristic (if there is such a word), And it is already showing results of violence. But NO where has the Tea Party demonstrated one inkling of racism. All the Tea Party wants is Legitimate representation and Responsible legislation.
On another note, Rachel Jeantel wasn't consistent with her testimony. She actually admitted to lying twice. The defense didn't treat her any differently because she is black than they would treat any unintelligible white person. They are a defense team its their job and they did it well. It's also interesting how people keep trying to make this about Zimmerman profiling.
As for the dummy who said that she was very intelligent because she spoke 3 languages, tell me just how intelligent is someone wh says, "I aint .cummin bak tumorraw"?
Tom Tomorrow on Zimmerman
None of the crap that Whittle and the rabid right wing bigots dredge up or manufacture about Martin has any impact on what happened ON THAT NIGHT.
ON THAT NIGHT, was Trayvon Martin doing anything illegal or even remotely suspicious?
NO. He was not.
ON THAT NIGHT, did George Zimmerman have any legitimate reason to be following Trayvon Martin?
NO. He did not.
ON THAT NIGHT, did Trayvon Martin have reason to believe that the person following him posed a real and immediate threat to his personal safety?
YES. He did.
ON THAT NIGHT, if Zimmerman hadn't murdered Martin for being black could Martin have used the "Stand Your Ground" defense against the threat presented by George Zimmerman?
YES. He could.
The so called "evidence" that Whittle spins to his own agenda wasn't admitted because it wasn't "evidence" in the events that took place ON THAT NIGHT.
But you still got the unjust, racist, jury verdict that you wanted so why are you still complaining about it?
When selling anything, including points of view, there is a cardinal rule:
"Don't talk past the close!"
That means "once you get what you want and seal the deal, SHUT UP before you screw it up!"
X.O.
Zimmerman did NOT go after Trayvon because he was black. He is NOT a racist. Nothing in the trial ever showed it was because he was black. Nothing in Zimmerman's history even hints at racism.
Race-baiters like you are a major part of the problem in this country.
http://townhall.com/columnists/jackiegingrichcushman/2013/07/25/the-question-should-be-why-n1648180/page/full
G.E.C. - Once again, you are hilarious.
The whole point of this Whittle video was to dredge up all sort crap, much of it made up out of whole cloth, to paiint Trayvon Martin as a criminal thug who deserved to be gunned down in the street like a rabid animal.
Of course, none of this made it's way to the courtroom because it didn't meet evidentiary standards and was irrelevent to the case before the court.
But you, Joe and Whittle want it considered anyway.
But when I point out that THE ONLY reason Zimmerman was following Trayvon was because he was black, all of a sudden you're all "Oh no! There was no evidence of that in the courtroom, therefore it isn't true!"
You can't have it both ways.
If Trayvon were a white kid wearing a polo shirt Zimmerman wouldn't have given him a second look and would not have beenfollowing him.
If Trayvon had not been the sort of thug that he was, he never would have been paranoid about being followed, nor would he have turned back to confront Zimmerman in an aggressive manner.
If Trayvon had been white and actions the same, Zimmerman would have done the same thing. Skin color didn't matter to him, as has been demonstrated over and over again.
But liberals like you can't accept the facts, and everything has to be about race.
G.E.C. - Trayvon Martin felt threatened and Stood His Ground against the perceived threat.
These sorts of confrontations are going to increase because people like you seem to think the way to solve the problem of violence in our streets is to give everybody a gun and the permission to open fire at anything that scares them.
Be careful what you ask for. You might just get it.
X.O.
Martin did NOT stand his ground. he turned around and confronted aggressively. He could have continued on his way but he chose poorly.
Your last statement only demonstrates your ignorance of what people like me really think.
G.E.C. - Under Florida's Stand Your Ground law, Trayvon Martin had no obligation to retreat from the threat he perceived from George Zimmerman, a dark skinned Hispanic stranger following him with a suspicious bulge on his belt (which turned out to be a loaded, semi-automatic pistol).
And your last statement demonstrates your inability to actually think.
X.O.
We aren't talking about standing one's ground - Martin didn't "stand" his ground, he advanced towards Zimmerman. HELLO!!!!!!!
And I'm sure he couldn't see any bulge of a gun.
You really are as stupid as I thought you were!
G.E.C. - "We aren't talking about standing one's ground - Martin didn't "stand" his ground, he advanced towards Zimmerman. HELLO!!!!!!!"
That is what Zimmerman claimed. Let's see what Martin said. Oh...wait...we can't...because he's DEAD!
That leaves Zimmerman free to make up any story he chooses.
Gee, the libs didn't answer even ONE of my questions. I feel SO left out!
Tonto's Catcher - That's because your "questions" were stupid and irrelevant.
This is cool!
Post a Comment