Monday, March 4, 2013
HERE IS A BRILLIANT WOMAN, DON'T YOU THINK?
WOW! 170,000,000 jobs to be lost in sequestration!
Amazing! We're going to lose more jobs than we have!
The outlook is grimmer than we thought.
I'm glad we have such wise people leading our country, aren't you?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
This woman got where she is due to affirmative action, not on merit.
The liberals always appeal to emotion - "women and children" - when they really couldn't care less about them, proven by their continual promotion of murder of the unborn, sending women into combat and that sort of garbage.
It is government policies which MAKE people homeless, it is gov't policies which lead to the need for the services she claims are needed. If we get the gov't out of this nonsense, the neeed will disappear.
GEC: They HAVE to make people poor, homeless, hopeless and dependent in order to make false promises that will garner their votes. They don't know any other way.
G.E.C. - "This woman got where she is due to affirmative action, not on merit.
The liberals always appeal to emotion - "women and children" - when they really couldn't care less about them, proven by their continual promotion of murder of the unborn, sending women into combat and that sort of garbage."
There you have it folks. All of the world's ills are due to uppity black folk and gender equality.
If we just kept the blacks in their place and kept women barefoot in the kitchen spitting out babies all of our problems would be solved.
Thus proclaimeth Glenn E. Chatfield.
Putz.
1) "This woman got where she is due to affirmative action, not on merit."
You. Don't. Know. That. You are assuming it because a) her skin color, b) her gender and c) she disagrees with you.
2) No one is "sending women into combat"! We have an all volunteer force and the change that was announced recently only ALLOWS women to VOLUNTEER for combat and they will only go into combat if they qualify for it.
The amount of prejudice and misinformation bouncing around in that noggin of yours is truly astounding.
You would make a nice case study for some neurology student's PhD thesis.
X.O.
It's called logical deduction. The woman is ignorant, and has always demonstrated the same stupidity and ignorance since she took office. Ergo, she is not qualified for the office, ergo she got there through affirmative action.
A woman can't get into combat on he own any more than can a man. She has to be sent in a unit. The fact that we are putting women in combat roles shows our lack of value for them.
No one is forcing women to have babies. What libs like you want is the license to kill a baby in the womb because the woman was too irresponsible to protect against pregnancy if she didn't want a baby. We've been down this road before and all you do is demonstrate your lack of any moral keel.
The rest of your comment is typical liberal rant.
G.E.C. - "It's called logical deduction. The woman is ignorant, and has always demonstrated the same stupidity and ignorance since she took office. Ergo, she is not qualified for the office, ergo she got there through affirmative action."
Why am I not surprised that you have absolutely no idea how our government actually works?
Lesson #1: People get elected to political office by getting more votes than the other person.
There is no "affirmative action", there is no test for "stupidity" or "ignorance". Because if there were, the Republican Party wouldn't even exist!
"A woman can't get into combat on he own any more than can a man. She has to be sent in a unit. The fact that we are putting women in combat roles shows our lack of value for them."
A woman has to VOLUNTEER for combat duty! VOLUNTEER! No woman in the military can be sent in to combat unless she VOLUNTEERS. So you want to DENY them the CHOICE to VOLUNTEER to serve their country on an EQUAL footing with their fellow soldiers.
Your attitude is "No honey, I know you want to serve your country on the front lines just like the men in your Unit, but we can't let you do that because you are just a woman. Us men have to protect you from your lack of judgement."
What complete and total Neanderthal nonsense! Women can make their own choices! They don't need people like you controlling them!
"No one is forcing women to have babies."
Yes, YOU are. Women have absolute sovereign right over their own reproduction. Neither you or anyone else has any right to take that control away from them.
If you had something growing inside of you that you didn't want that would impact you for the rest of your life you would be screaming like a whiny little baby to "GET THIS OUT OF ME NOW!"
X.O.
Are you being intentionally stupid?
A person doesn’t get to the point of being voted for until they’ve first been employed and worked in a position which would open them up for a career in politics. No one votes for an unknown to represent them. It was getting into the position which led Maxine to becoming a politician which was most likely acquired through Affirmative Action. Then she got voted in only because of her skin color. After all, it would be racist to not vote for a black person (that’s what liberals say about every one who is anti-Obama and he’s only half-black - no one wants to believe we don’t like him because of his policies, because liberal can only conceive of racism because THEY are racists).
Maxine has demonstrated over and over again her total ignorance of politics and yet she continues in office due to political-correctness.
The fact that we are allowing women to be in combat units is de facto sending them to war. Boy you are stupid. Women are NOT equal to men as soldiers. They are not physically built the same way. We’ve been down this road before. Physical requirements are always reduced. It also causes lots of sexual tension, demonstrated by the sexual interaction leading women to being sent home pregnant. Women should be valued and not used like a man - we are not the same. Libs like you want to make a genderless society of nothing but queers.
No one is telling a woman when or when not to have sex. And that is her sovereign right over HER body. But once she has conceived, she does not have a sovereign right to destroy another person. She knows when she has sex without contraception that she may get pregnant, and even with contraception it is possible. The only 100% sure contraception is abstinence. If a woman has sex, she is responsible for the outcome. You don’t murder and inconvenient child just because you can’t keep your legs closed.
You are an evil man.
GEC: I keep XO on here to demonstrate the absolute folly of the ignorant liberal mind set. He accommodates me constantly.
When he says, "No one is forcing women to have babies. Yes, YOU are," he reveals his inability to present a logical, consistent argument.
A simple DNA test proves the body inside a woman is not a cancer, not a malady, it is a human child.
That's science, which liberals like to pretend they believe, but do so only when it suits their cause.
If XO really has a daughter, as he has claimed more than once here, I'll bet the bimbo he caused to bring the child into the world never once said, "My fetus kicked today." I'll bet she said, "The baby kicked for the first time today."
They are so inconsistent it is pitiful.
Jo Joe - Your transparent attempt to spin my words is so easily debunked!
Here is your characterization of what I said...
"When he says, "No one is forcing women to have babies. Yes, YOU are," he reveals his inability to present a logical, consistent argument."
What I ACTUALLY said was (pay particularly close attention to the punctuation)...
"No one is forcing women to have babies."
Yes, YOU are.
The sentence in quotes was from G.E.C.'s comment.
What followed was my response to his comment.
Your lame attempt to append the two comments together to make it appear that I was being illogical or inconsistent was either a deliberate attempt by you to misrepresent my comment or a blatant example of your inability to read and comprehend the English language.
One of those facts are true.
Which is it?
Post a Comment