Thursday, February 6, 2014

THE RESULT OF LIBERAL POLICIES (Republican AND Democrat)



I have paid taxes since I was 18 years old. I still pay taxes. I despise that one penny has gone to people who think like this guy. But liberal policies (both Republican liberal policies and Democrat liberal policies) have deliberately produced a generation that believes we who work owe those who don't work (not who can't work) a living.

 That is absolutely outrageous.

Do you think college is going to do this twit one bit of good? He can't even speak English, is a "third year" college person (not student) and can't think his way out of the proverbial wet paper sack.

 Liberals are a bunch of stary-eyed chumps.

7 comments:

Clementine said...

How Liberal Policies Keep People in Poverty
I know this will make the far left have a collective seizure, but it's true that liberal policies that encourage the breakup of families and a nanny state are the main reasons that people do not pull themselves up. The left only sees two extremes, the super wealthy and the dirt poor. The reason they never bring up the middle class is because it's in the way of their plans. They are systematically destroying middle class and they'd rather people forgot it even exists. All we hear is taking more from the rich and giving to the poor with no expectations of people involved in their own progress. Of course, it's middle class they take from, but the media isn't about to look too hard at what liberal policies actually achieve. They only report on the intentions, not the disastrous results.

Encouraging dependency also encourages single parenthood and a lack a concern about community. The entitlement mentality keeps people focused on what government can do for them, not what they can do for themselves, their families or their communities. That responsibility was turned over to government long ago. Over 50 years of welfare and government programs and the result is more people lined up for help and fewer climbing out of poverty. It's more than a failed system. It's by design and that makes it far worse.

yep... the goal of the left elites is to destroy the middle class.....and create a dependent underclass...

it's why liberals focus on 'minimum wages' for the bottom barrel jobs instead of robust business development that would create good jobs and more more middle class workers....

It's why liberals focus on 'gay marriage' and sexual 'liberation' instead of real marriages and family values that would prevent abortions and all those poor dependent mothers living off government handouts..

Duckys here said...

There will always be abuse on the margins. That's a structural surety.

However, the fringe right will present the abuse at the margin as proof that the entire program is a failure.

One reason that it s impossible to deal with the shallowness and ignorance of the right is that the left wants to manage the abuse on the margins while the right simply wants to descend into social Darwinism.

Joe said...

Ducky: Margins smargins. All I want is for people who CAN work be required to work, or at least really try to, before they get taxpayer money.

Duckys here said...

No Joe, you want 100% surety that they are excluded and that is simply not possible.

So rather than deciding that the outliers should be identified you waste everyone's time by trying to have the program eliminated.

Not helpful.

Joe said...

Ducky: There you go making stuff up again. I never advocated the elimination of aid to the needy.

Duckys here said...

Joe, if you advocate for the complete elimination of abuse then by definition you are advocating for elimination.

Abuse cannot be completely eliminated.In a system this large it would be impossible and to say that its existence reveals liberals a "starry eyed chumps" is ridiculous.

Just what you mean can easily be intimated.

Joe said...

Ducky: "...if you advocate for the complete elimination of abuse then by definition you are advocating for elimination."

That is typical liberal logic. It is false logic, but it is liberal logic.