Wednesday, May 14, 2014
Stevens' Death Was Really Just A Side Effect
REALLY?
I MEAN: REALLY?
Come to think of it, that's the smartest thing I've ever heard any liberal ever say...and even it was dead wrong (pun intended).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Joe - How can you tell what they are saying with everyone talking at the same time.
Oh the joy of being a liberal and getting a free pass on saying any off the wall statement.
Right, Lisa. All those liberals and their "off-the-wall statements!"
Blinders much?
sh: Yeah. My wife says the same thing.
Lisa: I think she was outrageous!
SK: I wish they were all smart and sophisticated like you.
57 state much Shaw?
Murder: "the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought"
If a group of people attack a building with the intent of occupying or destroying the building itself, and in the process it catches fire, and one of the occupants of the building dies of smoke inhalation, can you really call that murder?
Or can you maybe ratchet the political rhetoric down a notch and just say he was killed as a result of the attack on the consulate?
Words have meanings. The word "murder" does not apply here. There is no indication that the attackers were out to personally kill Chris Stevens.
In fact, all of the reports I have read indicate that not only was Chris Stevens respected by the citizens of Benghazi, but those photos that Fox News posted of "his dead body being dragged through the streets" were actually local Benghazi residents attempting to get him to the hospital to save his life.
Sadly, they failed.
I, for one, do not welcome our Google Overlords and their restrictive log on policies.
The previous comment was from me and I am not Unknown.
XO: ... I am not Unknown."
So, who ARE you?
XO: There are legal degrees of murder. If you rob a bank and part of your robber band kills a person, you are guilty of murder, too. It is legally murder for someone to be killed due to an illegal act.
Stevens was murdered.
Post a Comment