Thursday, February 26, 2015

Why the President Is Not Allowed to Make Law

7 comments:

sue hanes said...

Joe - My thought on why the President is not allowed to make law is that one single person should not be able to be that powerful - to establish law. It should be done by a group of people.

Joe said...

sh: That would be the congress.

Z said...

Right you both are (Hi, Sue!)

That's also a KINGDOM, with a KING, not America...

I wish we had a better "group of people" in "congress", that's for SURE.

Joe said...

Z: Obama is the personification of the man who would be king.

IMHO said...

Obama is the Wet Dream of the Progressive bunch

Fredd said...

Barry is simply a slimy character who knows no honor.

He will do whatever he wants to do, and considers that the ends justify the means.

Exactly why would he seal his academic records? Because he got straight D's? No, not likely. He sealed them because we was likely admitted as a foreign student. Whichever truth serves him at the moment is the one he goes with. Currently, the citizen truth is more to his liking than the foreigner truth.

He at first swears he's a citizen, then he swears he's foreign, and we will likely never know for sure which is true.

He says over 22 times that he can't make law, only execute those enacted by congress. Now he enacts law himself.

Somebody has to stop him. That responsibility lies with congress, and Mitch McConnell and John Boehner had better step up, and sooner rather than later.

Joe said...

FREDD: "...Mitch McConnell and John Boehner had better step up, and sooner rather than later."

They won't.