Pirro: "But Americans don't want a spectator, they want a leader who's also not kidding around. Americans want a president not afraid to get in the game, secure our future and re-assert himself on the world stage.
In fact, it's what we're used to: it's in the DNA of American presidents. But can the man who occupies the White House today even be that leader?"
Pirro apparently doesn't let facts get in the way of her partisan blather.
Americans overwhelmingly support President Obama's position vis-a-vis her list.
Here are some of the highlights from the Politico Poll:
"· 17% called for the U.S. to do more to counter Russian aggression in Ukraine. 31% said the current policy is correct and 34% said the U.S. should be less involved.
Note: The poll was completed before the downing last week of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, the civilian airliner that was apparently attacked by rocket fire over Eastern Ukraine.
· 67% believe that U.S. military actions should be “limited to direct threats to our national security.” Only 22% believe that as a “moral leader,” the U.S. “has a responsibility to use its military to protect democracy around the globe.”
· 77% support plans to withdraw all troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2016. Only 23% oppose the plan."
Pirro is a FAUX NOOZ lackey, who never acquaints herself with what sane Americans care about. She does, after all, work for the propaganda arm of the GOP.
SK: ".17% called for the U.S. to do more to counter Russian aggression in Ukraine. 31% said the current policy is correct and 34% said the U.S. should be less involved."
So, which is he doing?
So far, all I've head him say is, "Oh, my. You shouldn't have done that. It makes us unhappy."
BTW: That fake statistic you sited only accounts for 82%. Where are the other 18%?
(I voluntarily ignored the "." on your behalf. I'm sure you know that .67% is a whole lot less than 1%. I'm also sure you know that its either 67% or .67, unless you were educated in government schools.)
Of course it could be that those "." were supposed to be bullets, but I'm just sayin'
You don't have to thank me. It's one of the many services I offer.
I was born in Miami, Florida, the son of an Air Force officer, traveled the world, was saved at age 17, and have served the Lord since. That's me on the left and my lovely wife, Bonnie...the pretty one...on the right.
1. Absolutely no foul language (including the use of asterisks). If you are not man or woman enough to control your language, you are not welcome here...go somewhere else.
2. I am not looking for strings of commenters arguing with each other, so confine your comments to the topic at hand and address your comments to me, unless you can be exceptionally gracious and polite.
3. Since this is my blog, I am the sole arbiter of what can be placed on this blog. My decisions are final and without recourse. All anonymous comments, unsigned, will be deleted, as will ad hominem attacks against me or others.
4. Within the scope of those rules, you may feel free to have fun here (I sure will). Sarcasm, wit, half-wit, nit-wit, parody, satire, puns (especially puns), etc. are encouraged.
FOUR PRINCIPLES THAT DEFINE TRUE CONSERVATISM:
1. Respect for The Constitution
2. Respect for Life
3. The Smallest Possible Government
4. Individual Responsibility
This blog is about my philosophy of government, which is a very conservative philosophy.
You are not required to agree with me (although you would be better off if you did).
I am biased toward conservatism, and make no apologies for that.
Freedom means not being controlled by the government, that being the very reason we declared our independence from Great Britain.
Government's job is not to provide things for people, but to provide the opportunity for people to persue the things they want via the vehicles of freedom and responsibility.
FAIR USE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
8 comments:
Joe - Judge Pirro makes sone good points here. Ones that are hard to disagree on. I wonder if she would consider running for President in 2016.
sh: She would get my vote, but it isn't going to happen.
Pirro: "But Americans don't want a spectator, they want a leader who's also not kidding around. Americans want a president not afraid to get in the game, secure our future and re-assert himself on the world stage.
In fact, it's what we're used to: it's in the DNA of American presidents. But can the man who occupies the White House today even be that leader?"
Pirro apparently doesn't let facts get in the way of her partisan blather.
Americans overwhelmingly support President Obama's position vis-a-vis her list.
Here are some of the highlights from the Politico Poll:
"· 17% called for the U.S. to do more to counter Russian aggression in Ukraine. 31% said the current policy is correct and 34% said the U.S. should be less involved.
Note: The poll was completed before the downing last week of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, the civilian airliner that was apparently attacked by rocket fire over Eastern Ukraine.
· 67% believe that U.S. military actions should be “limited to direct threats to our national security.” Only 22% believe that as a “moral leader,” the U.S. “has a responsibility to use its military to protect democracy around the globe.”
· 77% support plans to withdraw all troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2016. Only 23% oppose the plan."
Pirro is a FAUX NOOZ lackey, who never acquaints herself with what sane Americans care about. She does, after all, work for the propaganda arm of the GOP.
SK: ".17% called for the U.S. to do more to counter Russian aggression in Ukraine. 31% said the current policy is correct and 34% said the U.S. should be less involved."
So, which is he doing?
So far, all I've head him say is, "Oh, my. You shouldn't have done that. It makes us unhappy."
BTW: That fake statistic you sited only accounts for 82%. Where are the other 18%?
(I voluntarily ignored the "." on your behalf. I'm sure you know that .67% is a whole lot less than 1%. I'm also sure you know that its either 67% or .67, unless you were educated in government schools.)
Of course it could be that those "." were supposed to be bullets, but I'm just sayin'
You don't have to thank me. It's one of the many services I offer.
If Obama has his way he would allow the UN to come here and take over so he wouldn't have to deal wih that either.
Lisa, the UN is already HERE.
I know that Shaw I mean UN troops,ahich are probably already positioned
"...I mean UN troops,ahich are probably already positioned"
Pure paranoia.
Post a Comment