Have you ever used this picture? Have you ever seen it used?
I have. I have used it.
But you had better not use it any more, you could be sued.
Sarah Palin is being sued for using this common 911 picture.
How stupid is that?
Monday, September 16, 2013
MARRED REMEMBRANCE- Stupid Liberals
Have you ever used this picture? Have you ever seen it used?
I have. I have used it.
But you had better not use it any more, you could be sued.
Sarah Palin is being sued for using this common 911 picture.
How stupid is that?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
21 comments:
Maybe she should have obtained permission before using a copyrighted photo for fundraising purposes. The copyright holder reached out to her to try and rectify the situation before going to court, but Palin did not respond?
I am curious as to why you Joe, a law and order loving conservative would be troubled by this.
http://petapixel.com/2013/09/15/sarah-palin-sued-using-iconic-911-photo-without-permission/
Another brilliant comment by a super liberal , Obama loving, Palin hating progressive sheep.
Are certain kinds of theft okay with you? Or, do you give a pass to certain thieves? Sarah's entitled.
Really Joe & Bacon, think, for once, about what you are defending. You are flaunting copyright law too. Since 12 people look at your blog, no one will ask you to get permission. Then again, character is what you do when no one is looking.
Palin/Snooki 2016
Joe - I don't get it. Why should she be sued for using this picture.
It doesn't make any sense.
Because Sue, it is against the law. She was warned and asked to stop, which she did not do until she was sued by the legal owner of the copyright.
Darth, do you think Palin should have followed the law?
If Palin has any photos of Russia she took from her front porch, she is free to use those for her fund raising campaigns, no problem.
DM: "I am curious as to why you Joe, a law and order loving conservative would be troubled by this."
I'll bet you are. (Maybe it has to do with the fact that many have used the picture without incident, but when it's Sarah Palin it's somehow wrong...I don't know...maybe."
DB: Don't you just love 'em?
Craig: If it is theft, then the NYT, ABC, NBC CBS, MSNBC, CNN, TIME WARNER, and hundreds of others are guilty of theft, too.
Ducky: I don't think Palin will run. Snooki, maybe.
sh: You are quite right.
DM: "Because Sue, it is against the law."
So, who holds the copyright and why haen't they sued before?
XO: "...from her front porch,..."
I thought it was her back yard.
Joe, How many of those organizations did not get permission or pay a royalty?
Craig: 7
And you know that how, Joe?
Face it, Palin figures because she's a washed up/never was hack she has a right to violate copyright law to generate some income for Bristol's next nose job.
I give her credit for knowing how to keep the fringe right frothing.
Duckys here said...
Palin/Snooki 2016
Ducky/Schmucky 2013
Apparently Joe and Darth have become Socialists where there are no copywrite laws!
Any photo taken by anyone automatically enters the Conservative Collective where anyone else is free to use it to make money without the permission of, or compensation to, the originating photographer.
Joe, do you have any links, or evidence whatsoever to back up your claim that those orgs. did not have permission to use the photo?
I'm gonna bet that many people have used the pic, without a problem under the fair use rules of not for commercial or fundraising use.
Sarah Palin used the photo without permission to raise money, the mission of her PAC, and therefore broke the law.
How does a conservative, and this includes Sue, support that?
There is a significant portion of conservatives, and it is on display here today, that make accusations and when called to account and provide evidence, or are presented evidence that they in fact are wrong, go into smug name calling and obfuscation.
Sadly Joe, today, you joined that group.
DM:"...any links, or evidence whatsoever to back up your claim..."
I AM the evidence. All of the important sources link to me for their information.
In other words, Joe, you're blowing smoke again.
Another question, what does all this have to do with liberals?
Ducky, it has nothing to do with liberals.
Like many conservatives, Joe is angry and is not able to respond logically of present cogent arguments by himself.
It is one reason we see so many conservative blogs presenting videos and attached writings asking for comments.
For evidence just read his non responsive response...
Well, I don' understand it, Dave.
Liberals are simply the spawn of the devil and all our problems started with Obama.
I wonder how anyone can be that insular.
DM: "...Joe is angry and is not able to respond logically..."
I thought it was perfectly logical.
Sarah Palin decides to use a copyrighted photo for profit without proper permission or compensation ...
The owner of the rights to the photo sue ...
It's the liberals fault ...
Sorry, Joe, your logic is hardly air tight.
Post a Comment