tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post6771036028814112320..comments2023-10-10T05:30:54.239-04:00Comments on Jo-Joe Politico: Brigitte Gabriel’s Answer to a Muslim Woman Joehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09693381971064363612noreply@blogger.comBlogger82125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-56281745645456802392014-06-25T09:14:32.584-04:002014-06-25T09:14:32.584-04:00X.O.
You actually have nothing but speculations, ...X.O.<br /><br />You actually have nothing but speculations, assumptions and assertions on your side.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-77579945960831419682014-06-24T22:30:46.371-04:002014-06-24T22:30:46.371-04:00G.E.C. - I have scientific evidence and the overwh...G.E.C. - I have scientific evidence and the overwhelming mass of thousands of years of human knowledge on my side.<br /><br />You have nothing but bronze-age fairy tales told to frighten illiterate goat herders.<br /><br />I can prove I'm right.<br /><br />You can't prove anything at all.Xavier Onassishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01345787343828318445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-33599083038907107962014-06-24T17:44:03.809-04:002014-06-24T17:44:03.809-04:00X.O.
You, the super deluded man, can call someone...X.O.<br /><br />You, the super deluded man, can call someone else “delusional”?!?!?<br /><br /><i>"A delusion is a belief held with strong conviction despite superior evidence to the contrary.”</i><br /><br />You hold a lot of these: evolution, atheism, homosexualism, socialism, abortionism, and you even believe in man-caused global warming!<br /><br /><i>You, sir, are the single most delusional person I have ever encountered.</i><br /><br />You should be saying that while looking in the mirror, fool.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-51363498198901238992014-06-24T17:29:50.860-04:002014-06-24T17:29:50.860-04:00G.E.C. - Actually, "insane" is too gener...G.E.C. - Actually, "insane" is too generic.<br /><br />What you are, is INCREDIBLY delusional.<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusions<br /><br />"A delusion is a belief held with strong conviction despite superior evidence to the contrary."<br /><br />Definition<br /><br />Although non-specific concepts of madness have been around for several thousand years, the psychiatrist and philosopher Karl Jaspers was the first to define the three main criteria for a belief to be considered delusional in his 1913 book General Psychopathology.[2] These criteria are:<br /><br />certainty (held with absolute conviction)<br /><br />incorrigibility (not changeable by compelling counterargument or proof to the contrary)<br /><br />impossibility or falsity of content (implausible, bizarre or patently untrue)<br /><br />Furthermore, when a false belief involves a value judgment, it is only considered as a delusion if it is so extreme that it cannot be, or never can be proven true.<br /><br />For example: a man claiming that he flew into the sun and flew back home. This would be considered a delusion,unless he was speaking figuratively.<br /><br />You, sir, are the single most delusional person I have ever encountered.<br /><br />Xavier Onassishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01345787343828318445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-76286870027830234392014-06-24T17:02:18.133-04:002014-06-24T17:02:18.133-04:00X.O.
So, you being the Christophobe that you are,...X.O.<br /><br />So, you being the Christophobe that you are, call people “homophobes” because they believe homosexuality is perverse, and you call them racists because they disagree with a half-white/half-black president’s policies, and you call them bigots because they disagree with the lack of tolerance from people like you. Lots of nice name-calling but they are all nothing but arguments lacking arguments. Typical ad hominem attacks when you have no logical or rational response to their arguments.<br /><br />And then because I prove what a fool you are you call me insane. So, do you have a medical degree that gives you the knowledge to make such a diagnosis? And is it a proper diagnosis to label someone as “insane” or “mentally ill” just because they refuse to accept liberal, atheistic, Darwinian ideology, sexual perversion, or socialism as rational? Because the individual makes truth claims about things you refuse to accept? (of course you make illogical and irrational truth claims but that’s okay because you are you).<br /><br />Again, you are identified in Scripture as being a fool - because you say there is no God. So how can a fool like you have the mental ability to make a diagnosis of someone else being insane?Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-34421448025279477512014-06-24T16:51:56.549-04:002014-06-24T16:51:56.549-04:00G.E.C. - "(I just love how liberals are alway...G.E.C. - "(I just love how liberals are always quick to call conservatives “mentally ill.”)"<br /><br />Actually (and not surprisingly) you are mistaken once again.<br /><br />I do not refer to conservatives as mentally ill.<br /><br />I refer to them as homophobic idiots, racists and bigots, because that is what their words and actions prove them to be.<br /><br />But I do not call them mentally ill. It is only YOU I call mentally ill and that has little or nothing to do with the fact that you are conservative. <br /><br />It is because you completely insane.Xavier Onassishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01345787343828318445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-62510200723454110622014-06-24T15:54:59.829-04:002014-06-24T15:54:59.829-04:00X.O.
Dave - Your are correct. I don't think I...X.O.<br /><br /><i>Dave - Your are correct. I don't think I could tolerate being around G.E.C. I would want to call in the mental health professionals and have him retained for evaluation. I know they don't actually do that anymore, but they should.<br /><br />Joe, on the other hand, I wouldn't mind hanging out with. He has earned my respect over the years. He might not want to hang out with me, but I would certainly hang out with him.<br /><br />G.E.C., not so much really. </i><br /><br />That’s okay, X.O. I have a habit of not hanging around ignorant liberals who are not teachable. There is no point. (I just love how liberals are always quick to call conservatives “mentally ill.”)Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-73318020486253366702014-06-24T15:52:11.219-04:002014-06-24T15:52:11.219-04:00Dave,
I assumed you knew about the Reformation, b...Dave,<br /><br />I assumed you knew about the Reformation, but your comments do not demonstrate what your understanding about it is, since you continue to maintain the the Papist organization is Christian.<br /><br />I stand by my claims about the Muslim faith, and anyone who has actually studied that faith will agree with me. I didn’t make it all up out of thin air.<br /><br />And then you imply that I am not a peace-loving person! Sigh.<br /><br />My attitude is indeed loving. It is because if one loves people he will want them to know the truth. If I didn’t care about people then I wouldn’t try to educate them. It is people like YOU who disgrace the Christian faith by claiming apostates and heretics represent the Christian faith.<br /><br />As for name-calling, the majority of my so-called name-calling is very much in line with Scripture. I call people names identifying their behavior and ideology, etc. <br />Here’s my defense:<br />http://watchmansbagpipes.blogspot.com/2013/12/name-calling.html<br /><br />You have yourself called me names, as has every liberal who follow Joe’s blog. But that’s okay with you because you and your ilk are permitted to be intolerant and bigoted while decrying intolerance and bigotry.<br /><br />Yeah, I express my conservative beliefs as truth claims - sort of like Ducky, Craig, and X.O. express theirs. AH, but that’s okay because they are liberals and I am not. You sure have a hypocritical judgmental system.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-32004112955664840372014-06-24T15:28:45.497-04:002014-06-24T15:28:45.497-04:00Dave - Your are correct. I don't think I coul...Dave - Your are correct. I don't think I could tolerate being around G.E.C. I would want to call in the mental health professionals and have him retained for evaluation. I know they don't actually do that anymore, but they should.<br /><br />Joe, on the other hand, I wouldn't mind hanging out with. He has earned my respect over the years. He might not want to hang out with me, but I would certainly hang out with him.<br /><br />G.E.C., not so much really.Xavier Onassishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01345787343828318445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-62265237929244850672014-06-24T15:18:04.965-04:002014-06-24T15:18:04.965-04:00You are 100% correct Glenn, I've never conside...You are 100% correct Glenn, I've never considered the Reformation and know absolutely nothing about it.<br /><br />Thanks for setting me straight.<br /><br />All of this started at your essential point that anyone who claims to be a Muslim, but is peaceful, is either a liar, bent on deceiving people, or not a "real" muslim.<br /><br />To put it your terms, guess that I will choose to live in my ignorance, because I can't accept that. People can be wrong about Jesus and still be peace loving people.<br /><br />Speaking of love, Glenn, you show none. Your attitude, shown here when you mock those who do not believe as you, call people names, and insult publicly both believers and non-believers, reflects badly on the CHrist you choose to serve.<br /><br />Your justification of this behavior does accept that any of this is unChristian, or as some might say, sinful.<br /><br />I cannot imagine a world where people like Ducky, Craig and XO would want to spend even a few moments with you, and it is not about your conservative beliefs... it's about how you express them.<br /><br />Think about it...Dave Millerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16777087329254991970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-57787169528952589472014-06-24T10:51:22.558-04:002014-06-24T10:51:22.558-04:00X.O.
I never said or intimated that Islam worship...X.O.<br /><br />I never said or intimated that Islam worships Satan. I said it was a satanic religion - i.e. it comes from Satan.<br /><br />You need to learn to comprehend what you read.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-36149632371289092782014-06-24T10:50:19.334-04:002014-06-24T10:50:19.334-04:00X.O.
The crazy persons are those who say 2+2=5. ...X.O.<br /><br />The crazy persons are those who say 2+2=5. Those who say a tail is a leg, or a dandelion is a rose, or a queer union is a marriage.,<br /><br />It doesn't matter how many people agree on something - what matters is the truth. Millions of people can agree on a lie, but that doesn't make it true.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-73932248727446955052014-06-24T10:46:12.403-04:002014-06-24T10:46:12.403-04:00G.E.C. - "...the satanic religion of Islam&qu...G.E.C. - "...the satanic religion of Islam"<br /><br />Pretty sure Muslims don't worship Satan. You might want to recheck some of those scholarly sources you are always trotting out to prove how much you know about Islam. Because apparently you knoow nothing.Xavier Onassishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01345787343828318445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-35039878503338746642014-06-24T10:43:44.980-04:002014-06-24T10:43:44.980-04:00G.E.C. - If everyone in the world agrees that 2+2=...G.E.C. - If everyone in the world agrees that 2+2=4 and you are the lone voice insisting that 2+2=3, who is the crazy person?<br /><br />Everybody but you?Xavier Onassishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01345787343828318445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-75388516675031931352014-06-23T19:33:13.759-04:002014-06-23T19:33:13.759-04:00Dave,
You are being intentionally obtuse. I sta...Dave, <br /><br />You are being intentionally obtuse. I stated that the Crusades were not Christian because they were Catholic. I have also stated that there are Christians in the Romanist church in spite of the Romanist teachings.<br /><br />You will not find in Scripture anything which gives support for Christians to call a crusade, ergo the Crusades were not Christian. Christians participating in something does not make it Christian.<br /><br />Every non-theologian historian, as well as all people ignorant of Catholic doctrine compared to Scripture, assume that Romanism is Christian. IT is not - it is an apostate, heretical, cultic development off of Christianity. Again, do you have the vaguest idea what the Reformation was about?!?!?!<br /><br />Historians and most Christians think the Mormon church is Christian, they think JWs are Christian, etc. Just because people think a group is Christian, that doesn't make it so. There are non-negotiable doctrines which define what Christianity is.<br /><br />All your side comments about whether or not Papism is Christian has nothing to do with whether or not Islam has a reason to hold the Crusades against ANYONE - they are just red herrings. Islam started the war! HELLO!!! Do you not understand that historical significance, or do you just side with and defend the satanic religion of Islam?Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-51819062434834807622014-06-23T19:24:14.537-04:002014-06-23T19:24:14.537-04:00It might be Glenn, except it's true... I could...It might be Glenn, except it's true... I could introduce to plenty of fundamentalist baptist who hold to that view... <br /><br />And Glenn, we were discussing the Crusades, which you said were not Christian... <br /><br />Interesting I looked up Romanist Church looking for scholarship on that term... Suffice to say, only a link to your site came up. Is that because every historian is in league with the Catholics?Dave Millerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16777087329254991970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-20377682467659055872014-06-23T18:34:37.797-04:002014-06-23T18:34:37.797-04:00Dave,
Historians are not theologians.
Any non-R...Dave, <br /><br />Historians are not theologians.<br /><br />Any non-Romanist theologian will admit that Rome is apostate and heretical. Why do you think there was a reformation?!?!?<br /><br />Your final paragraph was just stupidity.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-13483164632863117302014-06-23T17:56:02.135-04:002014-06-23T17:56:02.135-04:00Actually Glenn, getting past who started it, many ...Actually Glenn, getting past who started it, many Muslims are very proud of Saladin, who could've just killed everyone in jerusalem, rather than giving them a way out, albeit, with a paid ransom.<br /><br />It was mercy, something not shown by the Christian/Catholic/Whatever side when they were in the same controlling position.<br /><br />I did not expect you to cite a source, because the great majority of seminaries, [whom i'm sure also fit into your apostate def] religious scholars and theologians all hold views that do not support your point of view.<br /><br />You come across as dogmatically closed as my Baptist friends who claim that only baptists are Christians and all true Christians are baptist because of "John the Baptist."Dave Millerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16777087329254991970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-50350048812714710982014-06-23T15:27:08.186-04:002014-06-23T15:27:08.186-04:00G.E.C. - "What you want are historians who sa...G.E.C. - "What you want are historians who say that the Catholic Church isn't Christian. You won't get that because the whole stupid world thinks the RCC is a Christian organization."<br /><br />Hmmm. You know, when a person holds something to be true that "the whole stupid world" disagrees with, there is a word for that.<br /><br />It's called "delusional".<br /><br />Glenn, I've tried to explain this to you before. You are insane. You have no grip on reality. You live in a fantasy world of your own creation and it is time to get some help before you hurt someone.Xavier Onassishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01345787343828318445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-45279256362257596472014-06-23T15:08:43.882-04:002014-06-23T15:08:43.882-04:00Dave,
What am I supposed to do - list every sing...Dave, <br /><br />What am I supposed to do - list every single history book which says who participated in the Crusades? They all say the same thing. They say that Rome initiated and organized them, that Catholics marched in them as well as mercenaries. They think that the Catholics were Christians, yet most Catholics weren't and aren't - they are Catholics.<br /><br />What you want are historians who say that the Catholic Church isn't Christian. You won't get that because the whole stupid world thinks the RCC is a Christian organization.<br /><br />It is only non-Catholics, especially those who are scholars and apologists, who demonstrate theologically that the RCC is NOT a Christian organization, but a man made organization which corrupted the Christian faith such that a reformation was began centuries ago to break out of that apostate and heretical organization.<br /><br />The point is that the Crusades, no matter how you want to describe the participants, saved the world from being overrun by Islam. They fought against the oppression of Islam. And Islam was finally stopped by Charles Martel at Tours.<br /><br />Again, the Muslims have no right to complain about the Crusades, since they were a direct response to the Muslim aggression.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-46273671308164123062014-06-23T14:46:02.013-04:002014-06-23T14:46:02.013-04:00Glenn, I'll take that as a no from you... For ...Glenn, I'll take that as a no from you... For centuries, Catholics were considered Christians, and you want to discount, or change the terms by which they were defined. <br /><br />Your reluctance to provide any evidence, and you can even use reputable Christian historians, says a lot about your desire to draw a definition of Christianity so right ad to make it very exclusive.Dave Millerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16777087329254991970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-19054740820991385732014-06-23T14:02:35.894-04:002014-06-23T14:02:35.894-04:00Dave,
How about reading history. WHO started th...Dave, <br /><br />How about reading history. WHO started the Crusades? The Roman Catholic Church.<br /><br />Who marched in the Crusades? Roman Catholics, some Christians, some mercenaries.<br /><br />Any history of the Crusades will tell you that with one exception - they consider Roman Catholicism to be a Christian organization and assume all members of that organization are Christians. That just demonstrates the theological ignorance of the historians. (after all, most historians which I've read also include Mormons as Christians!)Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-23362684685558330862014-06-23T13:35:50.192-04:002014-06-23T13:35:50.192-04:00Glenn, I guess that if you remove CHristianity fro...Glenn, I guess that if you remove CHristianity from the Crusades, which you did in your comments, then Christians have no responsibility for the actions of the faithful during that time.<br /><br />You did say the Crusades were not done by Christians. I disagreed, stating that scholarship was pretty clear on this. You denied that, saying my assertion was false.<br /><br />All I am asking for is some scholarship that buttresses your point. Can you provide it?Dave Millerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16777087329254991970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-7215684498774975962014-06-23T12:44:40.551-04:002014-06-23T12:44:40.551-04:00I guess we should be thankful for Israel being mos...I guess we should be thankful for Israel being most medical breakthroughs come from thereLisahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02173702830006208833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7632224842501413538.post-62324194045397049152014-06-23T11:21:09.363-04:002014-06-23T11:21:09.363-04:00Dave,
There were Christians in the Crusades, but ...Dave,<br /><br />There were Christians in the Crusades, but they were ordered by, and organized by the Romanist Church. Many of the troops were non-Christian mercenaries. Most were Catholics who were taught anti-semitism from the papacy.<br /><br />But the main point is that Islam has no right to complain about the Crusades, since it was Islam who ravished all the lands before them, and murdered anyone who didn't convert or pay the "tax" to remain alive. If there are scholars who do NOT teach this, then they are revising history.<br /><br />Islam is a plague on the world.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.com