About Fast and Furious: “I heard on the news about this
story…Fast and Furious.”
About Air Force One doing an un announced flyover DC: “It
was something (Uh) we found out about (Uh) along with all of you…”
About the IRS targeting conservatives: “I first learned
about it from the same news reports that I think most people (Uh) learned about
this. I-I (Uh) think it was on Friday.”
About the Justice Department confiscating two months of
phone records from AP reporters: (Jay Carney) “We don’t have any independent
knowledge of that. He found out about the news reports (Uh) yesterday on the
About the VA appointment foul-ups: “…from the news…”
About the State Department manipulating Benghazi talking
points: “…from the news.”
At a Democrat fundraiser Mr.
Obama told the group that he doesn't watch the news because, “Whatever they’re reporting
about, usually I know.”
The fellow conducting this conference was my Youth Choir pianist when I was Minister of Music at Plantation Baptist Church in Plantation, Florida. His name is Joe Martin, and he was a teenager when he was my pianist. He was highly skilled and was featured in various orchestras.
Joe is so much fun to watch! I love his enthusiasm and communication skills. He writes floods of music. The ad is for one of his new releases.
The administration of the leader of the free world, the
Commander in Chief, the most intelligent person to have ever held that office,
the supreme orator just can’t get his act together.
Did you hear about the failure of the rollout of the
ObamaCare web site? Did you hear about the loss of Emails by the IRS? Did you
hear about government computers being hacked by foreign interests? Did you hear
about the government using its computers to spy on Americans? Did you hear about the VA having hidden tens
of thousands of appointments, depriving veterans of their right to adequate
healthcare (ironic in the age of ObamaCare, don’t you think?)?
Well, that’s just not enough to declare him incompetent, is
it? If there was maybe one more item to add to the list, he might be teetering
on the brink of incompetence, right?
Now we learn that after spending $300 million on a brand new
computer system to handle Social Security disability claims, they can’t get it
to work and have no time line for when it might be workable!
“In the meantime,
people filing for disability claims face long delays at nearly every step of
the process — delays that were supposed to be reduced by the new processing
system.” It turns out that this massive technology had no coordinator in
charge, no one responsible for completing the project.
Acting Commissioner, Carolyn Colvin, facing confirmation by the Senate after
being nominated by Obama for a six year term, cannot explain what is happening
with the system’s completion. Her appointed assistant, Terrie Gruber, cannot
explain what is happening with the system’s completion.
troubled computer project is known as the Disability Case Processing System, or
DCPS. It was supposed to replace 54 separate, antiquated computer systems used
by state Social Security offices to process disability claims. As envisioned,
workers across the country would be able to use the system to process claims
and track them as benefits are awarded or denied and claims are appealed.
as of April, the system couldn't even process all new claims, let alone
accurately track them as they wound their way through the Disability Case
Processing System (DCPS) system. Of course, just a few more millions of dollars
will help Lockheed Martin, the prime contractor, will enable them to fix the
know what? I don’t think we can wait for more things to go wrong before we
proclaim President BO (the amateur president) to be an incompetent
Administrator in Chief.
think he justifies every day my decision to call him an amateur president.
Pro-Russian rebels, probably directly responsible for the
shooting down of Malaysian Airlines flight 17, murdering 298 people, have now
driven United Nations investigators out of the region shooting at them as they
left. Translation: The United Nations is powerless to do anything significant,
even such an important task as to investigate the taking down of a civilian
But have no fear! President BO (the amateur president) is
here! Remember, there were Americans in that plane. They might not have been as
important as the ambassadors in Benghazi, but they were Americans. So this
involves us, the U.S. Therefore, PBO (tap)’s firm response has been issued. He
“…as I’ve said throughout this crisis…to President Putin as
well as publically (what the heck does that mean: publically?), my preference
continues to be finding a diplomatic resolution within Ukraine. (What? A
diplomatic solution to the shooting down of a civilian airliner? Hasn’t the
deed already been done? What solution? He’s going to bring the dead bodies back
to life? Because that’s the only thing that could be considered a solution.) I
believe that can still happen. That is my preference today and will continue to
be my preference.
“…if Russia continues to violate Ukraine’s sovereignty, and
to back these separatists, and these separatists become more and more dangerous
(What? More dangerous than shoot down a civilian airliner?) and now are risks,
not simply to the people inside of Ukraine, but the broader international
community (Is not the shooting down of a civilian airliner ALREADY beyond the “risk”?)
then Russia will only further isolate itself from the international community
(something that I’m sure makes them tremble in their boots) and the costs for
Russia’s behavior will only continue to increase.” (Ooh! I’ll bet that put fear
in Putin’s gizzard!)
This pathetic excuse for a man, this cowardly, lily-livered,
yellow-bellied, sap sucking amateur Spokesperson in Chief for America will take
the same stand in this situation that he took in Libya, in Egypt and in other
Islamic nations. Red lines and all, we know how that turned out.
So now he takes a kneel before President Putin, now
considered the most powerful man on earth. That will turn Putin into a bowl of Jell-O,
Wake up Americans! Wake up to PBO (tap)’s ineffectiveness on
the world stage! Wake up to the man who wants to “fundamentally change” America
by bringing her down! Wake up to this namby-pamby pot of international Pablum. Get
this guy and those of his ilk out of D.C.!
The world’s governments no longer worry as
much as they once did about what Washington wants, partly because Washington doesn't know what it wants. U.S. policy has become erratic and half-hearted, subject to arbitrary change without notice.
Barack Obama, who apparently distrusts
American power, personifies this approach. He moves capriciously from subject
to subject. One week he’s furious about Syria and announces that Bashar
al-Assad has to go. When Assad doesn't go, Obama loses interest. He seems
always to be making a fresh start. When he’s not doing that, he’s “pivoting,”
shifting his interest from one continent to another. He seems detached much of
the time, then committed, then detached again.
On Libya, for instance, Obama opposed
taking part in the UN strike to oust Muammar Gaddafi. Then suddenly he decided
to join the French and other participants. The American bombs he sent became
the key to destroying Gaddafi and his reign, but Obama claimed America had
played only a peripheral role.
An Obama adviser famously described Libya
as a new model for American intervention, “leading from behind.” Whatever it
was, the allies didn't follow through and Libya was left in chaos. Terrorists
gratefully inherited a huge cache of weapons.
On Iran, the United States has taken
several large steps backward. When Israel publicly considered bombing Iranian
nuclear sites, the Americans discouraged the Israelis and adopted Iran’s bomb
as their own problem. Soon they announced, portentously, that all “options are
on the table,” including not just sanctions but also force.
The idea of an attack was soon abandoned,
however, and last autumn a new approach was taken: negotiation. The United
States led the UN Security Council and Germany in the effort to persuade Iran
to give up its dreams of a nuclear bomb in return for the lifting of economic
In November, theWashington
Postechoed the government
with a triumphant headline: “Iran, world powers reach historic nuclear deal.”
But in fact they had merely made a deal to hold some meetings about making a
deal that might be historic.
After half a year of talking, Iran’s view
can now be summarized: No, we are not building a nuclear bomb and No, you can’t
come and inspect us.
That the Parliament of our closest ally,
Great Britain, rejected an air campaign first gave Mr Obama an additional
reason for inactivity. The flailing seemed to end when Russian President
Vladimir Putin opened the door to a negotiated deal with Syria. But it was not
the end; it was the beginning.
For as the administration rushed to that
door, all over the world those who depended on America when in harrowing
circumstances were asking themselves: How reliable is America now? How strong
Also asking was Mr Putin. He noted the
contrast between Mr Obama’s bold talk and timid response. As the former head of
a friendly government said in a small meeting I attended not long ago: ‘Putin
is cautious. He will probe. If he encounters resistance, he will pull back.’
The US failure to follow through in Syria
gave the Russian president confidence that he could move with impunity.
SOON he was picking a fight with Ukraine.
Like the scene in The Godfather – when, at his child’s baptism, Michael
Corleone renounces the devil as the camera cuts back and forth to his men
eliminating rival gangsters – Putin, before global television cameras, watched
the opening ceremonies of the Sochi Olympics as Russian troops began movements
preparatory to seizing Crimea.
This week, in the skies over Ukraine, we
saw the consequences of the recklessness that the Russian godfather’s probing
Putin was not the only one to detect
opportunity in American indecision. China stepped up its probes in the East and
South China Seas. In the Middle East, with the US military presence drawn down
nearly to zero in Iraq and soon Afghanistan, an army of ruthless fanatics
gestating unnoticed in Syria’s east saw the chance to break out of national
boundaries and within a few weeks occupied much of western and central Iraq.
Why has so much of the global order come
apart so fast?
For the same reason that, as a friend
reports, on the streets of San Salvador those who will smuggle your child to
the Rio Grande have been securing an unprecedented volume of sign-ups. When
asked about the chances of the child staying in America once the border is
crossed, they tell parents: ‘It has never been easier.’
Now the word on weakness is everywhere,
even the poorest barrios of Central America.
The Scary Part is that Americans, especially liberals, support President BO (the amateur president)'s
The context for the change in America’s international
role was provided by a Pew Research Center poll in December. It determined that
more than half of Americans now think the United States should mind its own
business and let other countries “get along the best they can on their own” —
the highest number since Pew began raising that issue 40 years ago. Robert
Kagan, the author ofThe World America Made, believes Americans feel an uneasy desire to shed the
burdens that their country assumed from 1941 to the end of the Cold War. Many
Americans imagine they would be happier in a “normal” kind of America, a nation
more attuned to its own needs, less to those of the wider world.
Obama’s policies may have evolved in response to this public
view, or perhaps his ideas influenced the public. The uncomfortable truth,
however, is that the United States is the only great power in this generation.
And power always brings responsibilities.
In spite of the liberal left's insistence that PBO (tap) is a good president, he is not so regarded by the rest of the world. That he was elected twice is a testament to the gullibility of the left.
A CIVILIAN aircraft was shot down. We are not sure exactly who did it, but it is nevertheless down.
It might have been the Russians. It might have been Russian separatists. It might have been the Ukrainian government. Whoever it was, this is an international incident of monumental proportions.
The U.S. State Department, at their first press briefing, pretended nothing had happened and chose to speak about routine matters.
President BO (the amateur president) chose not to spend time on the event at the fundraising speech he was giving. Later he reacted with "sadness" at the event, but no more.
This is the least "presidential" president in the history of the nation. He came into the job unprepared and has learned absolutely nothing while in office (power). He refuses to deal appropriately with international matters. He is a weak kneed, lily-livered, yellow-bellied sap sucker. To any civilized American, he is pathetic.
In 1983 a Korean passenger jet liner was shot down by the then Soviets. Whereas President BO (the amateur president) would have gone fund raising, a real president would have effectively addressed the nation like this:
BTW: Ronald Reagan CANCELLED the remainder of his vacation to make this speech. Can you even imagine "President" Obama cancelling anything for something of this magnitude? Well he didn't.
Salary of retired US presidents: $450,000 per year for life.
Salary of House/Senate members: $174000 per year for life
Salary of the Speaker of the House: $223,500 per year for life
Salary of Majority/Minority Leaders: $194,400 per year for life.
Average salary of a soldier DEPLOYED in Afghanistan: $38,000 per year
Average income for seniors on Social Security: $12,000 per year
If you want to deal with income disparity, I know a good place to start.
ADDENDUM: I guess I give too many liberals too much credit for figuring out what a particular post is about. They seem unable to connect current events to a particular post unless led by the hand one idea at a time. I'm sorry for them, but I want to help. Therefore, let me connect the principles of this post to a current claim by a possible presidential candidate. Hillary Clinton claimed to have been dead broke when she and Bill left the WH. Let's give them that (even though it is unimaginable). Since then they both have demanded over $100,000 per speech. If they have each spoken 10 times since then, their debts were paid off and they are now rolling in dough. Come on, liberals. Even YOU can get this.
A commenter who calls himself (herself) Patriot 1212 provided the following from the comments on Always On Watch:
This is a list of Obama’s
Accomplishment, or how many screw-ups can one president make. This is
reprehensible. Here's the list from his first two and a half years for those
morons to absorb.
Five wars An assault on
Arizona Mexican insurgents
on American soil American agents
murdered in America The socialist
communist rape of the middle class Government motors Oil in gulf fiasco Obama care fiasco Shadow government
by czars Union thugs in the
steeets Children molested
lawfully in airports TSA BIGOTS
selecting victims for pat downs Real estate fanny
mae Freddie mac fiasco Housing catastrophe Teacher lying on
camera Doctors lying on
camera Paying for
insurgents to go to college Congressmen
espousing socialism Ignoring
constitutional law blatantly Class warfare Generational warfare Racial warfare Insulting the
supreme court justices publicly Insulting opposing
opinion publicly Paying socialist
news outlets from tax coffers Universities as
socialist factories of propaganda Paying pigford
frauds for fictional victimization Using every
available form of media for political propaganda Stealing elections Housing price
depression Un employment at 10%
Add to that list the fun he's had to date, such as his myriad scandals (Fast and Furious, VA, IRS, NSA, and so many more, and you have a failed presidency...one that seeks to fundamentally change America into a fallen mess.
In speech class I was at the top of the class. Everybody knew that the excessive use of "I" in a speech would garner an "F." Speeches were to be written and delivered with an emphasis on the subject of the speech and those involved, rather than on self.
That is why the following fact is egregious.
In an a recent speechObama referred to himself once every 12 seconds on average (Addendum: Don't bother reading it, just count the self references): THE PRESIDENT: Everybody knows I love Austin, Texas. (Applause.) Every time I come here I tell you how much I love you. I love Austin. I love the people. I love the barbecue -- which I will get right after this. (Laughter.) I like the music. (Applause.) I've got good memories here, I've got good friends.
I was telling somebody the last time I walked a real walk where I was kind of left alone was in Austin, Texas. (Applause.) Right before the debate here during the primary in 2007? 2008? It must have been 2008. And I was walking along the river and nobody noticed me, and I felt great. (Laughter.) And then on the way back somebody did notice me and Secret Service started coming around and -- (laughter) -- but that first walk was really good. So let’s face it, I just love Austin. (Applause.) Love the people of Austin.
I want to thank a proud Texan, Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, for being here today. We appreciate her. (Applause.)
It is great to play at the Paramount. I think I finally made it. I finally arrived. (Applause.) I've enjoyed the last couple of days, just getting out of Washington. And we started in Colorado, in Denver, and then went to Dallas and then came down here. And at each stop I've been able to just meet people and talk about people’s lives -- their hopes, their dreams.
I just had some coffee, as Kinsey may have mentioned, at the Magnolia Café, which is very nice. (Applause.) It was fun, too, because I had a chance to -- there were a bunch of folks there and some EMT folks were there on their break after the shift, and there were a group of high school kids who were getting together -- they were about to go on a two week long service trip to Peru -- which, by the way, reminds you, you should be optimistic whenever you meet young people because they’re full of energy and idealism. And so they were going to do this service trip and they were going to go for two days, then, to Machu Picchu -- the old Inca ruins in Peru. And I said, I always wanted to go there. And they said, well, you can come with us if you want. (Laughter.) And I said, I'm really tempted, but I think there are some things I've got to do. (Laughter.)
But I got them -- in exchange for a selfie with them, they promised that they would send me a picture of them when they get there. So I'm going to hold them to it. We got their email and if I don't get it I'll be upset. (Laughter.)
Anyway, so I was talking to Kinsey because she wrote me a letter and I wanted to reply in person. Because, as some of you may know, every day, we get tens of thousands of letters or correspondence, emails at the White House. And ever since the first day I was in office, what I've asked our Correspondence Office to do is to select 10 of them for me to read every night. And in these letters, people tell me their stories. They talk about losing a job, or finding a job. They talk about trying to finance a college education. They talk about challenges because maybe they’re the children of immigrants and they’re worried about their status. They talk about the hardships they’re going through, successes they’ve had, things they hope for, things that they’re afraid of when it comes to the future and their lives.
Sometimes people say thank you for something I've done or a position I've taken, and some people say, “You're an idiot.” (Laughter.) And that’s how I know that I’m getting a good representative sampling because -- (laughter) -- half the letters are less than impressed with me.
So Kinsey wrote me to tell me about her family. Her mom was a preschool teacher, her dad was an engineer. Together, obviously, they worked really hard, raised a family. They were responsible, did all the right things, were able to put their kids through college. Then they lost their jobs. And because they lost their jobs as mid-career persons, a lot of their resumes didn’t get answered. And their savings started to dwindle. And Kinsey works to pay for school, but it’s not enough.
And she told me that she’s always been passionate about politics and the issues of the day, but after last year’s government shutdown, all this stuff that's happened with her family, it doesn’t seem like anybody in Washington is thinking about them. She wrote, “I became a disgruntled citizen. I felt as if my government, my beloved government that’s supposed to look out for the needs of all Americans had failed me. My parents have always supported my siblings and me,” she wrote, “now it’s my turn to help them. I want to be involved. President Obama, what can I do?”
So I wanted to meet with Kinsey to let her know that I had heard her, that I listened to what was happening with her family, and I was thinking about her parents and I was thinking about her and her sisters. And I’m here today because of Kinsey. And I’m here today because of every American who is working their tail off and does everything right and who believes in the American Dream and just wants a chance to build a decent life for themselves and their families.
And you and folks like Kinsey are the reason I ran for President in the first place -- (applause) -- because your lives are the lives that I lived. When I listen to Kinsey I think about me and Michelle trying to finance our college education. When I think about somebody who didn't have health care, I think about my mom when she had cancer that would ultimately end her life at about the age I am now. When I think about equal pay, I think about my grandmother working her way up at a bank with nothing but a high school education and becoming the vice president of the bank, but always being kind of passed over for the next stage by men who were less qualified than she was.
So the stories that I hear in these letters, they're my story, and they're Michelle’s story, and they're the story that we had before I became senator -- worrying about child care, trying to figure out how to have a balanced life so that if Malia or Sasha got sick we could take time off, and how do you manage all that.
So that's why these letters are so important to me. And that's why whenever I’m out of Washington, part of what I want to do is just to remember and to connect with your stories so that you know that what I’m trying to do every single day is based on that experience.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Thank you! (Applause.)
THE PRESIDENT: And when you see the trajectory of Kinsey’s family, in some ways, it’s a little bit a story of what’s happened to America.
The crisis in 2008 hurt us all badly -- worse financial crisis since the Great Depression. But you think about the progress we’ve made. Today, our businesses have added nearly 10 million new jobs over the past 52 months. (Applause.) Our housing is rebounding. Our auto industry is booming. Manufacturing is adding more jobs than any time since the 1990s. The unemployment rate is the lowest point it’s been since September of 2008. (Applause.) Kinsey’s dad found a new job that he loves in the field he was trained for. (Applause.) So a lot of this was because of the resilience and hard work of the American people. That's what happens -- Americans bounce back.
But some of it had to do with decisions we made to build our economy on a new foundation. And those decisions are paying off. We’re more energy independent. For the first time in nearly 20 years, we produce more oil here at home than we buy from abroad. (Applause.) The world’s largest oil and gas producer isn’t Russia; it’s not Saudi Arabia -- it’s the United States of America. (Applause.)
At the same time, we’ve reduced our total carbon pollution over the past eight years more than any country on Earth. (Applause.) We’ve tripled the amount of electricity we generate from wind. We’ve increased the amount of solar energy we have by 10 times. We’re creating jobs across the country in clean energy. (Applause.)
In education, our high school graduation rate is at a record high; the Latino dropout rate has been cut in half since 2000. (Applause.) More young people are graduating from college than ever before.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Si se puede!
THE PRESIDENT: Si se peude. (Laughter.)
The Affordable Care Act has given millions more families peace of mind. They won’t go broke just because they get sick. (Applause.) Our deficits have been cut by more than half.
We have come farther and recovered faster, thanks to you, than just about any other nation on Earth. (Applause.) And so we’ve got a lot to be encouraged by, just as the story of Kinsey’s family makes us feel more encouraged. For the first time in a decade, business leaders around the world have said the number-one place to invest is not China, it’s the United States of America. So we’re actually seeing companies bring jobs back. (Applause.) So there’s no doubt that we are making progress. By almost every measure, we are better off now than we were when I took office. (Applause.)
But the fact is we’ve still got a long way to go. We’ve still got a long way to go, because while we’re creating more jobs faster these first six months of this year than any time since 1999, we know there are still a lot of folks out there who are looking for work or looking for more full-time work or looking for a better-paying job. Corporate profits are higher than ever. CEOs make more than ever. But you’re working harder than ever just to get by and pay the bills.
So, as a whole, the country is doing better. But the problem is, is that so much of the improved productivity and profits have gone to the folks at the very top, and the average person, their wages and incomes haven’t really gone up at all, and in some cases, haven’t kept up with the rising cost of health care or college or all the basic necessities that people need.
And so, Austin, I’m here to say that this country is not going to succeed if just a few are doing well. This country succeeds when everybody has got a shot. (Applause.) The country does better when the middle class does better, and when there are more ladders of opportunity into the middle class. (Applause.) That’s the kind of economy that works here in America. And that’s what’s at stake right now.
Now, that’s why we’re fighting for an opportunity agenda that creates more good jobs and creates more good wages -- jobs in American manufacturing, jobs in construction. We should be rebuilding infrastructure all across America, putting people back to work rebuilding roads and bridges and schools, creating a smart grid to transmit clean energy across the country more efficiently. (Applause.)
We can create good jobs in American energy -- (sneezes) -- bless me -- and innovation. (Laughter.) I’m okay, just haven’t had enough sleep. (Laughter.)
We’re fighting for an opportunity agenda that trains more workers with the skills to fill the jobs that are being created. I was talking to some folks from a community college before I came out here. We’ve learned that if we reach out to businesses and help them design the training programs in the community colleges, then when somebody finishes that training, they know they can get a job right away. (Applause.)
We’re fighting for an opportunity agenda that guarantees every child a world-class education from the time that they are three until the time that they graduate from college.
We’re fighting for an opportunity agenda that makes sure your hard work pays off with higher wages and equal pay for equal work, and workplace flexibility, and the overtime pay you’ve earned. (Applause.)
We’re fighting for opportunity for all and the idea that no matter who you are and what you look like and where you come from and who you love, if you work hard in America, if you work hard in Austin, if you work hard in Texas, you can make it here. (Applause.) You can make it. (Applause.)
So that's what we’re working for. And the good news is, is that the things that we need to do are well within our capabilities, our grasp. We know we can -- we know how to build roads. We know how to put people back to work on infrastructure. We know that if we invest in early childhood education, every dollar we put in, we get seven dollars back, and fewer dropouts and fewer teen pregnancies, and fewer folks going into the criminal justice system. (Applause.)
We know that if we do some basic things, if we make some basic changes, we’ll see more jobs, faster economic growth, lift more incomes, strengthen the middle class. They are common-sense things. They're not that radical. We know it’s what we should be doing. And what drives me nuts -- and I know drives you nuts -- is Washington isn’t doing it. (Applause.)
And let me be clear about why Washington is broken, because sometimes everybody says, well, you know what, all politicians are the same, he parties -- the Democrats, Republicans, it doesn't matter. Look, Democrats are not perfect, I promise you. I know a lot of them. (Laughter.) And, yes, every member of Congress, they're thinking about, I’d like to be reelected and I’d like to keep my job. That's human nature. We all understand that. But let me be clear. On the common-sense agenda that would help middle-class families, the overwhelming number of Democrats are in favor of these things.
They're in favor of minimum wage. They're in favor of equal pay. (Applause.) They're in favor of extending unemployment benefits. They're in favor of infrastructure. They're in favor of investing in research and development. They're in favor of making college more affordable. They’ve got specific proposals. They're willing to compromise. They're prepared to go forward.
So when folks say they're frustrated with Congress, let’s be clear about what the problem is. (Applause.) I’m just telling the truth now. I don't have to run for office again, so I can just let her rip. (Applause.) And I want to assure you, I’m really not that partisan of a guy. My favorite President is the first Republican President, a guy named Abraham Lincoln. You look at our history, and we had great Republican Presidents who -- like Teddy Roosevelt started the National Park System, and Dwight Eisenhower built the Interstate Highway System, and Richard Nixon started the EPA.
The statement I’m making is not a partisan statement, it is a statement of fact. (Applause.) So far this year, Republicans in Congress have blocked or voted down every serious idea to strengthen the middle class. They have said no --
THE PRESIDENT: Don't boo now, because what I want you to do is vote. (Applause.)
They’ve said no to raising the minimum wage. They’ve said no to fair pay. They said no to unemployment insurance for hardworking folks like Kinsey’s parents who have paid taxes all their lives and never depended on anything and just needed a little help to get over a hump. They said no to fixing our broken immigration system that we know would strengthen our borders and our businesses and help families. (Applause.)
Instead of investing in education that helps working families, they voted to give another massive tax cut to the wealthiest Americans. Instead of creating jobs by rebuilding our infrastructure, our roads, our bridges, our ports that help every business, they’ve decided to protect tax loopholes for companies that are shifting jobs overseas and profits overseas.
The best thing you can say about this Congress -- the Republicans in Congress, and particularly the House of Representatives -- the best you can say for them this year is that so far they have not shut down the government -- (laughter) -- or threatened to have America welch on our obligations and ruin our credit rating. That's the best you can say. But of course, it’s only July -- (laughter) -- so who knows what they may cook up in the next few months.
So even as they’re blocking policies that would help middle-class families, they keep on offering these theories of the economy that have failed over and over again. They say, well, if we give more tax breaks to folks at the top that's going to be good. If we make fewer investments in things like education, everything will work out. If we loosen the rules for big banks and credit card companies and polluters and insurers, somehow that's going to make the economy better. If we shrink the safety net and cut Medicaid and cut food stamps, and make sure that folks who are vulnerable and trying to get back on their suffer more hardship, somehow that's going to improve the economy.
Now, they believe these things -- sincerely, I assume -- that if they -- if we do these things, if we just take care of folks at the top, or at least if we don't empower our government to be able to help anybody, that somehow jobs and prosperity will trickle down and we’ll all be better off.
And that may work just fine for folks at the top. It worked fine for me. I don't need government. (Laughter.) Michelle and I now are in a position where we can pretty much finance Malia and Sasha’s college education. But I remember when Michelle’s parents couldn’t, they needed help. And I don't know about you, but I don't believe in pulling up the ladder once I’m up. I believe in extending it down and making sure that everybody has a chance to climb up. (Applause.)
The status quo certainly works for the special interests in Washington who like things just as they are. They’ll be fine whether Congress ever passes a bill again or not. But it doesn’t help you. It doesn't help your neighbors. It doesn't help your friends. It doesn't help your communities.
And what it does, is it just feeds people’s cynicism about Washington. It just makes people think, well, nothing can happen, and people start feeling hopeless. And we have to understand, in the face of all evidence to the contrary in Washington, we can do better than we’re doing right now. (Applause.) We can do better than what we’re doing right now.
We know from our history, our economy does not grow from the top down, it grows from the middle up. It grows from a rising, thriving middle class. It grows when we got ladders of opportunity for everybody, and every young person in America is feeling hopeful and has a chance to do what they can with the God-given talents that they have. That’s what we’re fighting for. That is what you should be fighting for. (Applause.)
And I will always look -- I’ll always look for ways to get Republicans and Democrats together in this effort. But I’m not -- I can't stand by with partisan gridlock that's the result of cynical political games that threaten the hard work of millions of Americans. I’m not just going to stand by and say, okay, that's -- I guess that's the way it is. Whenever and wherever I have the power, the legal authority to help families like yours, even if Congress is not doing anything, I will take that opportunity. I will try to make something happen. (Applause.) And that’s the reason -- that's the reason why my administration has taken more than 40 different actions just this year to help working Americans -- because Congress won’t.
Congress won’t act to make sure a woman gets equal pay for equal work. So I made sure more women have the protections they need to fight for fair pay in the workplace -- because I think when women succeed America succeeds. So we went ahead and did that. (Applause.)
Congress won’t act to create jobs in manufacturing or construction. Well, I went ahead and speeded up permits for big projects. We launched a new hub to attract more high-tech manufacturing jobs to America. I want to make sure the next revolution in manufacturing is right here in America; it’s an American revolution, not a German or a Chinese revolution. I want it happening right here in Austin, Texas. (Applause.)
Congress so far hasn’t acted to help more young people manage their student loan debt. So I acted with my lawful authority to give nearly 5 million Americans the chance to cap their student loan payments at 10 percent of their income so they can manage it better, so that if they go into teaching, or they go into social work, or they're doing something at a non-for-profit, that they're not encumbered by mountains of debt. I don’t want our future leaders saddled with debt before they start out in life. (Applause.)
And Republicans in Congress so far have refused to raise workers’ wages with a higher minimum wage. So I acted to require that federal contractors pay their employees a fair wage of at least $10.10 an hour -- (applause) -- which would give hundreds of thousands of workers a raise. I asked business owners and governors and mayors and state legislators -- anybody I could work with -- do what you can on your own, I told them.
Since the first time I asked Congress to raise the minimum wage, Congress hasn’t done anything, but 13 states have gone ahead and raised theirs. (Applause.) And, by the way -- this is important to remember just because folks are always trying to run the okey doke on you -- (laughter) -- the states that have increased their minimum wages this year have seen higher job growth than the states that have not increased their minimum wage. (Applause.) And more and more business owners are choosing to lift the wages for their workers because they understand that it’s going to be good to have productive workers, loyal workers, invested workers.
Just yesterday, before I came down to Texas, when I was in Denver, I met with Carolyn Reed. She owns six Silver Mine sub shops. She started her own business. She was working at UPS and decided she wanted to be a business owner, got her first franchise. Her and her husband mortgaged their house. Eventually, they got an SBA loan. Now, she’s got six stores. A wonderful woman. And today, she decided to raise her hourly employees’ wages to a minimum of $10.10 an hour. (Applause.) She just went ahead and did it on her own, because she realized that she’ll have less turnover and she’s going to have more productive workers.
As long as Congress will not increase wages for workers, I will go and talk to every business in America if I have to. (Applause.) There’s no denying a simple truth: America deserves a raise, and if you work full-time in this country, you shouldn’t live in poverty. That’s something that we all believe. (Applause.)
Now, here’s where it gets interesting. There are a number of Republicans, including a number in the Texas delegation, who are mad at me for taking these actions. They actually plan to sue me. (Laughter.) Now, I don’t know which things they find most offensive -- me helping to create jobs, or me raising wages, or me easing the student loan burdens, or me making sure women can find out whether they’re getting paid the same as men for doing the same job. I don’t know which of these actions really bug them. (Laughter.)
The truth is, even with all the actions I’ve taken this year, I’m issuing executive orders at the lowest rate in more than 100 years. So it’s not clear how it is that Republicans didn’t seem to mind when President Bush took more executive actions than I did. (Applause.) Maybe it’s just me they don’t like. I don’t know. Maybe there’s some principle out there that I haven’t discerned, that I haven’t figure out. (Laughter.) You hear some of them -- “sue him,” “impeach him.” Really? (Laughter.) Really? For what? (Applause.) You’re going to sue me for doing my job? Okay. (Applause.)
I mean, think about that. You’re going to use taxpayer money to sue me for doing my job -- (laughter) -- while you don’t do your job. (Applause.)
There’s a great movie called “The Departed” -- a little violent for kids. But there’s a scene in the movie where Mark Wahlberg -- they’re on a stakeout and somehow the guy loses the guy that they’re tracking. And Wahlberg is all upset and yelling at the guy. And the guy looks up and he says, “Well, who are you?” And Wahlberg says, “I’m the guy doing my job. You must be the other guy.” (Laughter and applause.) Sometimes, I feel like saying to these guys, I’m the guy doing my job, you must be the other guy. (Applause.)
So rather than wage another political stunt that wastes time, wastes taxpayers’ money, I’ve got a better idea: Do something. (Applause.) If you’re mad at me for helping people on my own, let’s team up. Let’s pass some bills. Let’s help America together. (Applause.)
It is lonely, me just doing stuff. I’d love if the Republicans did stuff, too. (Laughter.) On immigration issues, we’ve got -- and to their credit, there are some Republicans in the Senate who actually worked with Democrats, passed a bill, would strengthen the borders, would help make the system more fair and more just. But the House Republicans, they haven’t even called the bill. They won’t even take a vote on the bill. They don’t have enough energy or organization or I don’t know what to just even vote no on the bill. (Laughter.) And then they’re made at me for trying to do some things to make the immigration system work better. So it doesn’t make sense.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: (Inaudible.)
THE PRESIDENT: I’m sorry, what are you yelling about now? Sit down, guys. I’m almost done. Come on, sit down. I’ll talk to you afterwards, I promise. I’ll bring you back. I’m wrapping things up here.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: (Inaudible.)
THE PRESIDENT: I understand. See, everybody is going to start -- I’m on your side, man. Sit down, guys, we’ll talk about it later, I promise.
So, look, here’s what we could do. We could do so much more -- you don’t have to escort them out. They’ll sit down. I promise, I’ll talk to you afterwards.
We could do so much more if Republicans in Congress would focus less on stacking the deck for those on the top and focus more on creating opportunity for everybody. And I want to work with them. I don’t expect them to agree with me on everything, but at least agree with me on the things that you used to say you were for before I was for them. (Applause.)
You used to be for building roads and infrastructure. Nothing has changed. Let’s go ahead and do it. (Applause.) Ronald Reagan passed immigration reform, and you love Ronald Reagan. Let’s go ahead and do it. (Applause.)
I mean, what changed? I’m just saying. (Laughter.) That’s what made our country great, a sense of common purpose, a sense we’re all in it together as one nation, as one people. We can debate the issues, we can have our differences, but let’s do something. (Applause.) Let’s rally around an economic patriotism that says, instead of giving more tax breaks to millionaires, let’s give tax breaks to working families to help pay for child care or college.
Instead of protecting tax loopholes that let corporations keep their profits overseas, let’s put some of that money to work right here in the United States rebuilding America. (Applause.) We can rebuild our airports, create the next generation of good manufacturing jobs, make sure those are made in America.
Let’s rally around a patriotism that says we’re stronger as a nation when we cultivate the ingenuity and talent of every American, and give every 4-year-old in America access to high-quality education -- good-quality preschool. (Applause.) Let’s redesign our high schools to make them more relevant to the 21st century economy. Let’s make college more affordable. Let’s make sure every worker, if you lose your job, you can get a good job training that gives you an even better job. (Applause.)
Let’s embrace the patriotism that says it’s a good thing when our fellow citizens have health care. It’s not a bad thing. (Applause.) That’s not a bad thing. It’s a good thing when women earn what men do for the same work. That’s an all-American principle. (Applause.) Everybody has got a mom out there or a wife out there or a daughter out there. They don’t want them to not get treated fairly. Why would you be against that?
It’s a good thing when parents can take a day off to care for a sick child without losing their job or losing pay and they can’t pay their bills at the end of the month. It’s a good thing when nobody who works full-time is living in poverty. That is not radical. It’s not un-American. It’s not socialist. That’s how we built this country. It’s what America is all about, us working together. (Applause.)
So let me just wrap up by saying this: The hardest thing to change in politics is a stubborn status quo. Our democracy is designed where folks who have power, who have clout -- they can block stuff, they can keep things as they are. It’s hard. It’s even harder when Washington seems focused on everything but your concerns, Kinsey’s concerns.
There are plenty of people who count on you getting cynical and count on you not getting involved so that you don’t vote, so you give up. And you can’t give into that. America is making progress, despite what the cynics say. (Applause.) Despite unyielding opposition and a Congress that can’t seem to do anything, there are workers with jobs who didn’t have them before; there are families with health insurance who didn’t have them before; there are students in college who couldn’t afford it before; there are troops who served tour after tour who are home with their families today. (Applause.)
Cynicism is popular. Cynicism is popular these days. It’s what passes off as wisdom. But cynics didn’t put a man on the moon. Cynics never won a war. Cynics didn’t cure a disease, or start a business, or feed a young mind. Cynicism didn’t bring about the right for women to vote, or the right for African Americans to be full citizens. Cynicism is a choice.
Hope is a better choice. Hope is what gave young soldiers the courage to storm a beach. Hope is what gave young people the strength to march for women’s rights and civil rights and voting rights and gay rights and immigrant rights. (Applause.)
Hope is what compelled Kinsey to sit down and pick up a pen, and ask “what can I do,” and actually think maybe the President might read that story and it might make a difference. (Applause.) And her voice rang out here in the Paramount Theatre. And it’s her voice and your voice that’s going to change this country. That’s how we’re going to make sure that we remain the greatest nation on Earth -- not by asking what we can do for ourselves, but what we can do for each other and what we can do for our country.
And so, as President, I’m going to keep a promise that I made when I first ran: Every day, I will keep asking the same question, and that is, how can I help you? And I’ll keep treating your cares and your concerns as my own. And I will keep fighting to restore the American Dream for everybody who’s willing to work for it.
And I am going to need you to be right there with me. (Applause.) Do not get cynical. Hope is the better choice.
Thank you, Texas. Thank you, Austin. God bless you. (Applause.) Not counting instances when he quoted a letter from a citizen or cited dialogue from a movie, President Barack Obama used the first person singular–including the pronouns “I” and “me” and the adjective “my”–199 times. President Abraham Lincoln’s Gettyburg Address was only 272 words–and did not include any form of the first person singular. President Obama is a clinical Narcissist.
The members of the House Committee on Ways and Means continue to ask all the wrong questions and press the wrong issues. They seem bent on "discovering" who knew what and when. We already know that.
What they should be asking is: Did the IRS backed up their emails as required by law? If so, where were they backed up? Did all of the hard drives on all of the backup locations fail as well? If not, who is going to be held criminally liable for breaking the law?
The IRS sends emails to one of three local servers. Is it the case that the hard drives of one or more of those servers crashed during the same period of time as the crash of Lois Learner's hard drive? If so, an awful lot more than just emails was lost. Were other documents stored on those servers lost, too?
Did Lois Learner personally send and/or answer all of those emails, or did her staff do so? If her staff sent and/or answered them, did their hard drives crash as well?
Exactly how many hard drives crashed during the time period of this investigation?
There are two ways a hard drive can crash. It can physically break (either part of the drive motor, or the read arm), or it can be influenced by an outside source, such as corrupted files, viruses, and other malware. Any hard drive either breaks or is deliberately instructed to delete data. It does not do so of its own accord. Which of those events did Lois Learner's (et. al.) suffer?
If the hard drive physically broke, was it taken to the Geek Squad at Best Buy to have its data recovered? If it was overwritten, corrupted or suffered a virus, the Geek Squad at Best Buy could fix that, too. If not the Geek Squad at Best Buy, does the IRS have no one at least as well trained as the Geek Squad at Best Buy?
Emails don't just exist on hard drives. In fact, they don't live there at all. So if Lois Learner's hard drive crashed, it did not affect her emails at all. With this in mind, did the IRS contact the companies/locations on whose servers the emails do reside requesting copies of those emails?
Did the servers in those other companies/locations all crash at during the same time period? If so, a lot more people than the IRS are in trouble. Of course we know that did not happen.
What about the people to whom the emails were sent? Did their hard drives crash during the same time period, too? If not, did you require all of those who received emails from Lois Learner to forward them back to IRS computers?
Are there any technical people at the IRS who have at least the ability to follow up on those questions? Were they instructed to do so? (If there were no such technical people available, the IRS can call me. I'll show them how to get those emails).
Members of the House Committee on Ways and Means are either are too dumb to ask those questions, and thus need my help, or they are in some sort of collusion in the whole scandal. There are no other options.
I was born in Miami, Florida, the son of an Air Force officer, traveled the world, was saved at age 17, and have served the Lord since. That's me on the left and my lovely wife, Bonnie...the pretty one...on the right.
1. Absolutely no foul language (including the use of asterisks). If you are not man or woman enough to control your language, you are not welcome here...go somewhere else.
2. I am not looking for strings of commenters arguing with each other, so confine your comments to the topic at hand and address your comments to me, unless you can be exceptionally gracious and polite.
3. Since this is my blog, I am the sole arbiter of what can be placed on this blog. My decisions are final and without recourse. All anonymous comments, unsigned, will be deleted, as will ad hominem attacks against me or others.
4. Within the scope of those rules, you may feel free to have fun here (I sure will). Sarcasm, wit, half-wit, nit-wit, parody, satire, puns (especially puns), etc. are encouraged.
FOUR PRINCIPLES THAT DEFINE TRUE CONSERVATISM:
1. Respect for The Constitution
2. Respect for Life
3. The Smallest Possible Government
4. Individual Responsibility
This blog is about my philosophy of government, which is a very conservative philosophy.
You are not required to agree with me (although you would be better off if you did).
I am biased toward conservatism, and make no apologies for that.
Freedom means not being controlled by the government, that being the very reason we declared our independence from Great Britain.
Government's job is not to provide things for people, but to provide the opportunity for people to persue the things they want via the vehicles of freedom and responsibility.
FAIR USE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.