Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Monday, June 27, 2011


Let's see if I can explain it so even a liberal/progressive can understand it.

Pretend I'm a multi-millionaire (I know...that's a stretch).

Now let's pretend that you are the government.

Furthermore, let's pretend that my buddy, Jeff, is a "government bureaucrat."

Finally, pretend that your friend, Pete, is a "consumer."

Now you (the government) take $10,000.00 of my money and give it to Jeff to oversee some government project.

$10,000 put into the economy, right?


While Jeff gets paid, and may spend the money, it was MY money he spent, whether on himself or on the project. Jeff did not produce anything but hours worked, but that was money I could have used to buy something that had been produced by somebody, providing them with income, me with something I want and thus lifting the economy.

Let's say you (the government) did NOT take my $10,000.00.

Then I could expand my business, hire Pete and, presto!, a job created!

But you know what?

If you are a liberal/progressive, you will not get it, because you are not capable of understanding, only of knee-jerking.

The rest of you remember this: Whenever the government spends money, no matter what for, it puts nothing into the economy.

You can't take money from one person and give it to the next person and call it growth!

There has been no net gain and nothing has been produced.

In today's economy, a dollar's value is based on a product-service/hour worked.

Nothing produced, nothing earned.

When the government spends money IT'S YOUR MONEY!

That, sir, is why raising taxes will not cure our government's debt or spending problem.

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Monday, June 20, 2011


The following is from one of my heroes:

Did you know that music is forbidden by islam?
Posted by Ann Barnhardt - June 18, AD 2011 7:27 PM MST
Yes, that's right. According to the koran and hadiths, music - ALL MUSIC - is "haraam", which means forbidden.

Musloid citation HERE.

So, a world completely dominated by islam and under Sharia, which is their oft-repeated goal, would be SILENT except for the raging raving of men, the braying of the imams, and the muffled whispers of the females and children. No music. No sound. No joy. Just hopeless, despairing silence.

No more people coming together after a lifetime of instruction and practice to make harmonious beauty that touches the soul and lifts the spirit. No more of this, ever. EVER. EVER. EVER.

No, all of those people would be executed for doing that, as would all of the people there listening and enjoying it. As would you for enjoying its reproduction. Stop and really think about that. Imagine the flautist guy, or the harpist or the first violin guy being drug from their chair right there on the stage, forced to their knees by muslim "morality police" and executed with an AK shot to the head, or a knife across the throat, right there. Look at those people and then imagine them laying face-down on the stage bleeding out through their jugular. BECAUSE THEY PLAYED BEAUTIFUL MUSIC. That is what islam is. That is what islam commands. That is what is coming if we don't stand and fight.

The only modulated sound would be this vexatious, demonic, grating, shrieking filth . . . FIVE TIMES PER DAY.

Anyone who would call that hellish noise "the prettiest sound on earth" must be demonically possessed. You hear me, Barack?

Thursday, June 16, 2011


If you choose to comment on this video, be certain you have watched it first, because I will delete any comments that do not derive from its content.

Furthermore, if you choose to comment on this video, do not point out Condell's philosophical mind set, instead focus on the facts put forth in the video, if you know how to do that. (If you don't know how to do that, please don't take up my blog space with inanities.)

Personally, I think he has hit the proverbial whatever on the proverbial wherever.

Monday, June 13, 2011


Hey! New York's 9th District!

Is that really the best you can do?


What do you think that says about you?

Thursday, June 9, 2011


While watching the NBC Today Show, I saw a segment on Anthony Weiner in which some supposed "expert" was commenting on the latest developments in the picture/Twitter scandal.

Various Democrats were paraded across the screen decrying the antics of the tail-weary congressman.

Then some genius in the news department decided they should get the opinion of a real expert on the subject of sex scandals.

So they sought the opinion of... are you ready for this?...they sought the opinion of won't believe this...they sought the opinion of William Jefferson Clinton!


Bill Clinton.

You remember him.

He used to be president or something.

You read correctly.

They sought the opinion of Bill Clinton!

Bill Clinton!

Can you say, "Monica Lewinski?"

Bill "I did not have sex with that woman" Clinton!

There are lots of people on this earth that I would not have cared what they thought about a sex scandal.

Bill Clinton is at the absolute peniscle (oops...I meant pinnacle) of that list.

Frankly, asking Bill Clinton about a sex scandal sucks.

To be more accurate, Monica Lewinski su...well, never mind.

Do you know what BJ Clinton said?

He said, "I am disappointed in Anthony Weiner."



President Clinton, the Former, set the standard for sleaze in government.

I mean under the desk in the Oral Orifice! (Ooops! Make that Oval Office. I seem to have some sort of digital lysdexia today).

I could be wrong, but I don't think Twitter, FaceBook and other unsociable media were around in the BC/ML days, else we would have been treated to a show we didn't want to see.

Aye, aye, aye, aye aye!

Who are these perverts, anyway?

And here you thought "evolution" was in place to improve nature.

It is, after all, a sad, sad tail (Oooops! Make that tale).

Wednesday, June 8, 2011


Well, Anthony Weiner has confessed.

He wasn't certain that the pictures he tweeted were really him, but he confessed.

Funny thing...I know with absolute certainty that the pictures were not me. And you knew they were not you.

But he wasn't sure they weren't him.

That's because he knew that they were him.

But fear not, for he has taken "full responsibility" for his impropriety.


He has taken no responsibility.

Let me tell you why.

In the liberal/progressive mind, "taking responsibility" means absolutely nothing more than admitting that you did something. There is never a price to pay.

Let me tell you lib/progs what responsibility is, so next time you'll recognize it (fat chance).

Let's say you and I are in a car on the freeway, and I'm driving.

Suppose you don't think I'm going fast enough, so you tell me to go faster.

I say, "No, the speed limit is 70 mph and that's what I'm doing."

Then you say, "You little wimp (not that anyone would consider me a little anything), we're going to be late. Drive faster."

And I refuse, so you repeat the demand.

Finally I give in and speed up to 85 mph.

Then the little blue lights come on and the cop saunters up to my window, asking whether I knew how much over the speed limit I was going.

"Oh, yes, I do, officer, but my passenger is a fault because he told me to speed up."

News flash!

The officer will not ticket the passenger, he will ticket me.


Because I'm responsible and I have to take responsibility by receiving and paying the $350.00 ticket.

See, responsibility always carries with it a price that must be paid,

Like Janet Reno at Wako; like Bill Clinton at Lewinski; like President BO (the Child President) at the economy, Democrats "take responsibility" and pay no price.

And so it is with Weiner.

He thought he could give us the shaft, expose his viagror, and not prick his conscience.

Turns out he doesn't have a conscience, only sorrow that he got caught.

Isn't it just a little bit sad when absolute sleaze is accepted as the norm for our leaders?

Come on, people. When are you going to wake up?

If this tide doesn't turn, it will sink all boats to the same depths.

Then who will be left to take responsibility?

Tuesday, June 7, 2011


Born 1776, Died 2008

It doesn't hurt to read this several times.

Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the last Presidential election:

•Number of States won by: Obama:19 McCain: 29
•Square miles of land won by: Obama:580,000 McCain: 2,427,000
•Population of counties won by: Obama:127million McCain: 143 million
•Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Obama: 13.2 McCain: 2.1

Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory McCain won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.

Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."

Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegal's - and they vote - then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.

Monday, June 6, 2011


So, what do you think?

Is Mitt Romney all that Ann Barnhardt says he is?

Does he fit the conservative ideal close enough to become the Republican nominee?

Does his record count at all?

Is he the "pre-chosen one" of Republicans this time around?

Is it "his turn?"

Do they really "take turns?"

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Saturday, June 4, 2011

PROUDLY STOLEN (With Permission)

Lone Ranger, over at Important Stuff--Or Not, has written an apt description of the liberal/progressive mind set.

With his permission, I have copied and pasted them here.

Refute with facts, if you can, liberals. Otherwise, just accept it.

25 Immutable Truths About Liberals

Over the years I've been writing this blog, I've been throwing out little self-evident truths that seem to have no exceptions that prove the rule. I've made a list of some of them and will add to it as I remember them or make up more. Most of this list I've come up with myself. A few I've borrowed from others.

1. Always expect the worst from a liberal and you will never be surprised.

2. Never try to reason with a liberal. They disregard any evidence that conflicts with their beliefs.

3. You can always tell what liberals are up to by what they accuse conservatives of doing.

4. Liberals don't debate, they argue.

5. The only standards liberals have are double standards.

6. Liberals feel, conservatives think.

7. Whenever you don't understand a liberal's motives, just look for the money.

8. Liberals cannot be embarrassed. They lack the gene to blush.

9. The Liberal creed is, "Do as I say, not as I do."

10. Liberals get older, but they never grow up.

11. There are no honest liberals. If they were honest -- especially to themselves -- they would be conservatives.

12. A liberal's business is nobody's business, but everyone's business is a liberal's business.

13. Liberals have an inflated sense of self-worth. They are like house flies that criticize the air-worthiness of a Stealth fighter. (Sarah Palin, George W. Bush, ad infinitum are morons.)

14. Liberals lack a sixth sense that conservatives have in abundance -- common sense.

15. Liberals never stop hating.

16. There are only two types of liberals -- the deceivers and the deceived. The difficulty is telling them apart.

17. Every time liberals get on their high horse, they get bucked off.

18. Liberal programs are so wonderful that they have to be forced on people.

19. Liberals always choke on their own medicine.

20. When given a moral choice, liberals always come down on the wrong side of the fence.

21. The only way liberals can build themselves up is by tearing others down.

22. Liberals not only refuse to learn from their mistakes, they refuse to admit them.

23. Liberals have only two political positions -- blind devotion and blind hatred.

24. Liberals are incapable of attacking the message, so they always attack the messenger.

25. Liberal diversity is only skin deep.

Liberal/Progressives, which of these is wrong and why?

Thursday, June 2, 2011



(A) The number of physicians in the U.S. is 700,000.

(B) Accidental deaths caused by Physicians per year are 120,000.

(C) Accidental deaths per physician is 0.171

Statistics courtesy of U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services.

Now think about this:


(A) The number of gun owners in the U.S. is 80,000,000 (Yes, that's 80 million) .

(B) The number of accidental gun deaths per year, all age groups, is 1,500.

(C) The number of accidental deaths per gun owner is .0000188

Statistics courtesy of FBI

So, statistically, doctors are approximately 9,000 times more dangerous than gun owners.

Remember, 'Guns don't kill people, doctors do.'

FACT: NOT EVERYONE HAS A GUN, BUT almost everyone has at least one doctor.


This means you are over 9,000 times more likely to be killed by a doctor as by a gun owner!!!

Please alert your friends to this alarming threat.

We must ban doctors before this gets completely out of hand!!!!!

Out of concern for the public at large, we withheld the statistics on lawyers for fear the shock would cause people to panic and seek medical attention!

(Courtesy of a friend via email.)

Wednesday, June 1, 2011


In Exodus 18, we see Moses acting as the lone leader of Israel and the sole arbiter of individual’s sins.

Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, told him that he needed to adopt “governmental subsidiarity,” by which the people would govern themselves in a sort of hierarchy, or tier-structured system.

"Subsidiarity" is the idea that a central authority should only perform those tasks that cannot be performed effectively at a more immediate or local level.

As the "power structure" moves away from the local level, it is "diluted" until all that is left for those at the top to do is to provide national defense, negotiate international treaties and trade agreements, and insure the rule of law (from which we derive the third brance of govenrment: the Judiciary).

They started in groups of ten families, roughly the equivalent of a local neighborhood.

Then there were to be groups of 50, analogous to a city or county commission.

After that, groups of 100 would be formed, something like state legislatures.

Groups of 1,000, the next tier, would serve as a national legislature.

Moses would serve as a chief executive and Erin and Joshua would serve as his “cabinet.”

Does that system look familiar?

It is the Biblical system of governance after which the United States of America is ordered, And very deliberately so.

You liberal/progressives can jump up and scream, pout, thrash about, be horrified or just sit in denial, but that won’t change a thing.

The government of the United States was conceived as an imitation of the principles of government laid out in the Bible.

I know how you hate that.

Too bad.

That’s where it had its origins, and that’s the end of the matter…like it or not.

If you had any semblance of the “open mind” you so often accuse conservatives of not having, you might learn something from that and be the richer for it.

I will not hold my breath.

The system into which we have been evolving since FDR has been, and is, a system modeled more closely to the Marxist idea of turning the whole process around and putting the essence of power, not in the hands of the people, but in the hands of a hopefully benevolent centralized government.

This system would look like this: The President rules over the Senate, which rules over the Congress, which is also ruled by the Supreme Court and all of whom rule over the people.

One-by-one, in small increments, our nation has moved toward the latter, abandoning the former.

We do so at our peril.

It will take only one despotic character elected to the presidency to suddenly, for the “good” of society as a whole, complete the turn-around and make us into a nation that is no longer a shining example to the world of “liberty and justice for all,” but a totalitarian nation, ruled from the top down.

We may have already found that character.

I, for one, will not sit idly by and let him,.and his liberal/progressive supporters complete the reversal.